Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help pattern authors with Context + Forces #419

Open
spier opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Help pattern authors with Context + Forces #419

spier opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
⚙️ Type - Meta Improving how we collaborate in this repo is the main focus of this issue / PR

Comments

@spier
Copy link
Member

spier commented May 26, 2022

Pattern authors often struggle with filling in the Context + Forces sections of our pattern template.

Could we give them more guidance on how to fill in Context + Forces?

@NewMexicoKid you are dropping nuggets of wisdom about these sections in your reviews sometimes (as in the example below). Could you help us extend the pattern template with further instructions, especially around these two sections?

Example of "nuggets of wisdom"

Whenever possible, forces should be stated in a way that indicates the trade-offs (which can hint at the levers by which one can react to a given force).

So if Product Owners are reluctant to be more collaborative and transparent, what is motivating them to do so? (Is it a cultural tendency to secrecy to protect proprietary information to gain a strategic advantage? If so, then is it a matter of noting which information needs to be protected vs. which info, when shared, can result in compensating advantages?)

Originally posted by @NewMexicoKid in #417 (comment)

@NewMexicoKid
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll take a look at the pattern template to see if might be improved.
Another thought I had was to see if I can get Bob Hanmer (the real patterns expert) to do a live session to review a few of the newer patterns and give feedback on them. Do you think that some of the new pattern authors would be interested in that?

@spier
Copy link
Member Author

spier commented May 27, 2022

Thanks! I think that adding properties of good things to list in Context/Forces, as well as examples like the one above would be super helpful for authors.

Also a joined session with Bob Hanmer would be great. Probably something we could organize after summer, so maybe in August/September?

@spier spier added the ⚙️ Type - Meta Improving how we collaborate in this repo is the main focus of this issue / PR label May 27, 2022
@spier
Copy link
Member Author

spier commented Sep 26, 2022

hi @NewMexicoKid. Just wanted to see if you were able to spend some time on this topic?

@NewMexicoKid
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for the delays--lots of real life interruptions, alas. I'll look into this.

@spier
Copy link
Member Author

spier commented Dec 5, 2022

@NewMexicoKid today I was thinking that as a first step we could make it easier for pattern authors to "learn by example".

For that we could:

  • go through the section in the pattern template
  • for each section, identify at least one existing patterns where that section is "especially well written"
  • add a link from the template section to the "especially well written" pattern section

While that does not remove the need for more explanations in the pattern template, making learning by example easier might be a good start?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚙️ Type - Meta Improving how we collaborate in this repo is the main focus of this issue / PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants