You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
I am performing population-scaled SV detection and genotyping using Manta.
I have performed individual SV detection for 300 individuals and then merged all genotyped diploid SV files of samples together. As an end output I got SV-heterozygous (1/1) and SV-homozygous genotypes (0/1) for my samples but no Reference-homozygous genotypes (0/0).
Although group calling produces 0/0 genotypes, my sample size is perhaps large for joint calling. Looking through past issues (namely #122 ), I considered the option of using Paragraph to merge , however I see on the software's expected output that 0/0 genotypes are also not included.
Is there a way that I can force Manta genotyping/merging to produce the much valuable 0/0 genotypes for my cohort? Do you think it is sensible to assume that a missing genotype (./.) should be regarded as 0/0 ?
Best regards,
Domniki
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello,
I am performing population-scaled SV detection and genotyping using Manta.
I have performed individual SV detection for 300 individuals and then merged all genotyped diploid SV files of samples together. As an end output I got SV-heterozygous (1/1) and SV-homozygous genotypes (0/1) for my samples but no Reference-homozygous genotypes (0/0).
Although group calling produces 0/0 genotypes, my sample size is perhaps large for joint calling. Looking through past issues (namely #122 ), I considered the option of using Paragraph to merge , however I see on the software's expected output that 0/0 genotypes are also not included.
Is there a way that I can force Manta genotyping/merging to produce the much valuable 0/0 genotypes for my cohort? Do you think it is sensible to assume that a missing genotype (./.) should be regarded as 0/0 ?
Best regards,
Domniki
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: