You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an instrument scientist I would like to see only those fields in alarm that are really off by a fair margin. So if a field is off from the limit but very close then we shouldn't see an alarm for this value.
How & Where?
Fields on jaws and motors
Reproducible (Yes/No)?
Yes
Additional Information
We need to define the tolerance levels for interesting fields. This could be absolute values or percentages.
It should be possible to set these tolerances by the scientists themselves.
The tolerance values should be optional
This can potentially tie up with the ticket where we want to define the approach for user defined alarms. (See this)
Acceptance Criteria
Describe how the user is going to define the tolerance for fields interesting for alarms
New ticket to implement the approach
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue Description
As an instrument scientist I would like to see only those fields in alarm that are really off by a fair margin. So if a field is off from the limit but very close then we shouldn't see an alarm for this value.
How & Where?
Reproducible (Yes/No)?
Yes
Additional Information
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: