Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

POLARIS: Investigate a potential ignoring of an error by IBEX from the Rotating Sample Changer #5027

Closed
KathrynBaker opened this issue Dec 10, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@KathrynBaker
Copy link
Member

As an instrument scientist on POLARIS, I want to know why IBEX thought a sample was in the beam when the Maclennan crate was displaying an error.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. There is an explanation as to what happened in the comments of this ticket
  2. Any tickets needed to avoid this situation occurring again in the future are created

Notes

  1. The first comment contains the content of a Footprints that was submitted to motion control
  2. This may be related to Rotating sample changer: changes from tests of 4028 #4287, at least as far as methods of resolving it go
  3. POLARIS/HRPD/GEM Sample Changer #2173 was the ticket that created this code and has some potentially useful information
@KathrynBaker
Copy link
Member Author

The Polaris sample changer Maclennan control crate indicated an error -
position 3 requested, but the sample had failed to lower. However, the
Move_Finished block indicated "1" (i.e. it though the move has been successful)
and started the next run with no sample in the beam.

@KathrynBaker KathrynBaker changed the title POLARIS: Investigate a potential ignoring of an error by IBEX POLARIS: Investigate a potential ignoring of an error by IBEX from the Rotating Sample Changer Dec 10, 2019
@Tom-Willemsen
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in planning meeting: I have merged the relevant information from this ticket into #4287 as we feel they are probably the same issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants