-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NIH AIM:5 YR:2 TASK:1 | 2.5.1 | Design and implement usage reports and data citation metrics based on Make Data Count #4
Comments
Aim 5: Standardize usage metrics with the repository and across other repositories The Make Data Count project has provided an opportunity for repositories to standardize the usage metrics (e.g., number of views, downloads, and citations). There are still many inconsistencies in the way each generalist repositories (and domain-specific repositories) count these metrics, making it difficult to assess and compare the popularity of various datasets and give proper credit to data authors. Based on the Make Data Count initiative, we propose to provide full metrics on dataset usage for the Harvard Dataverse repositories and coordinate the implementation of the metrics with other repositories (e.g., Dryad, with which we have already been having conversations on this area) so the values and assumptions are comparable. |
Updates from Phil on slack
|
This came up at the daily today. |
Yeah, I just sent @KellyStathis a DM on the GREI Slack. Let's wait for Leonid to get back and figure out internally a good date for us (I'm polling internally to see who wants to be there). Then we'll see what day works for Kelly and/or Matt. |
Just a quick update that a few of us met with Kelly and afterward @qqmyers created a great doc to explain how the new tracker probably won't "just work" with Dataverse without some future development. I got approval from Matt and Jim to link to the doc during a GREI Open Metrcis subcommittee meeting so I imagine no one will mind if I link it here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cSgRVdOKkY6ouBZyqbDonZtFPNHjvBpu6DOyXHtnL8Y/edit?usp=sharing |
March update: (2.5.1) On March 22, we met with Kelly and Sarla from DataCite about the new Usage Tracker (notes) and are engaging in a more technical followup with their development team in a Google doc. We are concerned that the tracker won't "just work" without further development. We also started a thread on the tracker to get input from the community. On March 31 we participated in the GREI Metrics Sub-Committee Meeting (notes), where we discussed year 2 plans. |
Update
Action
|
2024/01/03: Closing, work will be tracked here: #118 |
NIH wants each repository to share dataset usage data for datasets that were funded by the NIH. The NIH wants to see how the datasets that they funded are being used and they want the reporting methodology and statistics to be done in in a standardized way across repositories.
The deliverable for this AIM is begin to provide the usage statistics for datasets funded by the NIH. The pre-requisites for this are the at we've agreed what we are collecting in a standard fashion with the other repositories and we have implemented the code to make the data collection happen.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: