You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One issue with the current implementation is that we are using hardcoded meeting IDs (or meeting IDs that are room names) and participant names. We should try to do something like the following:
each new room (even if it is a similar room name to a previous room) is assigned a unique identifier, and rhythm-rtc stores this identifier. if you make a new room with the same name as a previous one, it's overwritten.
each user in a new room is assigned a unique identifier as well. If I join meeting A, my identifier will be different than my identifier for meeting B.
data sent to the rhythm server uses these identifiers for participant IDs and meeting IDs.
Long-term, it would be nice to track participants and meetings over time, but we should first implement sending "correct" data from rhythm-rtc to the rhythm-server, and this is the most straightforward way to do it.
This will mostly be code written in Express on the server-side of rhythm-RTC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One issue with the current implementation is that we are using hardcoded meeting IDs (or meeting IDs that are room names) and participant names. We should try to do something like the following:
Long-term, it would be nice to track participants and meetings over time, but we should first implement sending "correct" data from rhythm-rtc to the rhythm-server, and this is the most straightforward way to do it.
This will mostly be code written in Express on the server-side of rhythm-RTC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: