You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I'm inspecting the cross-attention layers from the pretrained transformer translation model (MarianMT model), It is very strange that the cross attention from layer 0 and 1 provide best alignment between input and output. I used bertviz to visualize all heads from all 6 layers, and tried different language, english to german and english to chinese, it all gives the same results, which does not make sense because the last layers should be more accurate according to the paper Jointly Learning to Align and Translate with Transformer Modelshttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.02074.pdf
But when I'm looking at the cross attention of model Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-de and Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-zh , the layer 1 gives the best alignment. the code is below:
fromtransformersimportAutoTokenizer, AutoModelimportosos.environ['TRANSFORMERS_CACHE'] ='/data2/hanyings/.cache'tokenizer=AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-de")
model=AutoModel.from_pretrained("Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-de", output_attentions=True)
encoder_input_ids=tokenizer("She sees the small elephant.", return_tensors="pt", add_special_tokens=True).input_idswithtokenizer.as_target_tokenizer():
decoder_input_ids=tokenizer("Sie sieht den kleinen Elefanten.", return_tensors="pt", add_special_tokens=True).input_idsoutputs=model(input_ids=encoder_input_ids, decoder_input_ids=decoder_input_ids)
encoder_text=tokenizer.convert_ids_to_tokens(encoder_input_ids[0])
decoder_text=tokenizer.convert_ids_to_tokens(decoder_input_ids[0])
frombertvizimportmodel_viewmodel_view(
encoder_attention=outputs.encoder_attentions,
decoder_attention=outputs.decoder_attentions,
cross_attention=outputs.cross_attentions,
encoder_tokens=encoder_text,
decoder_tokens=decoder_text
)
And the results are:
From the above pictures, I observed that the first 2 layers give the best alignment whereas the last layers do not align the input and output tokens properly. Can you please help me to explain why this happens? and If the alignment of the last layer is not accurate, how does the model provide correct predictions? Please! It is very important for my research project! @patrickvonplaten@sshleifer@Tiedeman @joaogante @bobosui
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When I'm inspecting the cross-attention layers from the pretrained transformer translation model (MarianMT model), It is very strange that the cross attention from layer 0 and 1 provide best alignment between input and output. I used bertviz to visualize all heads from all 6 layers, and tried different language, english to german and english to chinese, it all gives the same results, which does not make sense because the last layers should be more accurate according to the paper Jointly Learning to Align and Translate with Transformer Models https://arxiv.org/pdf/1909.02074.pdf
But when I'm looking at the cross attention of model Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-de and Helsinki-NLP/opus-mt-en-zh , the layer 1 gives the best alignment. the code is below:
And the results are:
From the above pictures, I observed that the first 2 layers give the best alignment whereas the last layers do not align the input and output tokens properly. Can you please help me to explain why this happens? and If the alignment of the last layer is not accurate, how does the model provide correct predictions? Please! It is very important for my research project!
@patrickvonplaten @sshleifer @Tiedeman @joaogante @bobosui
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: