Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Query metrics: Chapter 14. CMS #95

Closed
5 of 10 tasks
rviscomi opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #168 or #200
Closed
5 of 10 tasks

Query metrics: Chapter 14. CMS #95

rviscomi opened this issue Jul 23, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #168 or #200
Assignees
Labels
analysis Querying the dataset ASAP This issue is blocking progress

Comments

@rviscomi
Copy link
Member

rviscomi commented Jul 23, 2019

Part Chapter Authors Reviewers Tracking Issue
III. Content Publishing 14. CMS @amedina @westonruter @mor10 @sirjonathan #16

READ ME!

All of the metrics in the table below have been marked as Able To Query during the metrics triage. The analyst assigned to each metric is expected to write the corresponding query and submit a PR to have it reviewed and added to the repo.

In order to stay on schedule and have the data ready for authors, please have all metrics reviewed and merged by August 5.

Assignments

ID Metric description Analyst Notes
14.01 Top CMSs by # websites @rviscomi  
14.02 Version of the plugin @rviscomi amp-plugin custom metric
14.03 Template mode used (paired vs. native) @rviscomi amp-plugin custom metric
14.04 Suggestion: WordPress.com enables AMP by default so it would be interesting to see how many sites have disabled it in addition to how many self-hosted sites have enabled it. Not sure if this is possible or not but would also help @rviscomi amp-plugin custom metric
14.07 Comparison against non-CMS cases would also shed light on demographics, geography (together with device usage per region) @rviscomi CrUX form factor
14.08 Connection types @rviscomi CrUX ECT
14.09 Is it happening? @rviscomi Need TTFB metric
14.10 Breakdown of CMS FCP from CrUX @rviscomi  
14.11 Breakdown of CMS FID from CrUX @rviscomi  
14.12 Delightfulness @rviscomi CLS

Checklist of metrics to be merged

  • 14.01 Top CMSs by # websites
  • 14.02 Version of the plugin
  • 14.03 Template mode used (paired vs. native)
  • 14.04 Suggestion: WordPress.com enables AMP by default so it would be interesting to see how many sites have disabled it in addition to how many self-hosted sites have enabled it. Not sure if this is possible or not but would also help
  • 14.07 Comparison against non-CMS cases would also shed light on demographics, geography (together with device usage per region)
  • 14.08 Connection types
  • 14.09 Is it happening?
  • 14.10 Breakdown of CMS FCP from CrUX
  • 14.11 Breakdown of CMS FID from CrUX
  • 14.12 Delightfulness
@rviscomi rviscomi added the analysis Querying the dataset label Jul 23, 2019
@rviscomi rviscomi added this to the Content written milestone Jul 23, 2019
@rviscomi rviscomi self-assigned this Jul 23, 2019
@rviscomi rviscomi mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2019
@rviscomi
Copy link
Member Author

rviscomi commented Sep 3, 2019

@amedina in case you're interested, many of the Ecommerce queries in #94 would be applicable to this chapter just by changing the Wappalyzer category to CMS. You can see the types of results in this sheet.

@rviscomi rviscomi added the ASAP This issue is blocking progress label Sep 4, 2019
@rviscomi
Copy link
Member Author

@amedina I've gone ahead and applied the ecom queries to the CMS category and updated the results sheet. I'll get the authoring issue opened so you can start reviewing the results and writing the chapter.

This was referenced Sep 24, 2019
@rviscomi rviscomi reopened this Oct 9, 2019
@rviscomi
Copy link
Member Author

@amedina I've created some new metrics:

14_13d: distribution of image bytes per page per CMS
image

image

14_14b: distribution of HTML bytes per page per CMS
image
image

I'll continue to do the same for the rest of the metrics that aren't broken down by CMS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analysis Querying the dataset ASAP This issue is blocking progress
Projects
None yet
1 participant