We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
很棒的工作,并且非常感谢作者开源的数据集和代码!我们在尝试复现稀疏性实验(V. Evaluation-E. Performance on Alleviating Data Sparsity)的时候,根据您提供的Yelp/dataset.pkl划分四个子数据集(先根据UI interaction density进行ranking,并保证四个子数据集中的用户数量相等),与原文Table 6 (a)和(b)中提供的各子数据集统计指标相差较大。具体来说,原文各子数据集中的UI平均交互数量大致依次为:3.56、8.45、18.36、92.53,但是我们得到的各子数据集中的UI平均交互数量大致依次为:2.85、4.04、6.58、25.24。因此,我们想申请获取您划分得到的四个数据集来follow这部分实验。如果您愿意分享,我们将不胜感激。 Email:[email protected]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
很棒的工作,并且非常感谢作者开源的数据集和代码!我们在尝试复现稀疏性实验(V. Evaluation-E. Performance on Alleviating Data Sparsity)的时候,根据您提供的Yelp/dataset.pkl划分四个子数据集(先根据UI interaction density进行ranking,并保证四个子数据集中的用户数量相等),与原文Table 6 (a)和(b)中提供的各子数据集统计指标相差较大。具体来说,原文各子数据集中的UI平均交互数量大致依次为:3.56、8.45、18.36、92.53,但是我们得到的各子数据集中的UI平均交互数量大致依次为:2.85、4.04、6.58、25.24。因此,我们想申请获取您划分得到的四个数据集来follow这部分实验。如果您愿意分享,我们将不胜感激。
Email:[email protected]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: