Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Article] Trustwise Case Study #255

Open
12 tasks
NAMRATA-WOKE opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
12 tasks

[Article] Trustwise Case Study #255

NAMRATA-WOKE opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@NAMRATA-WOKE
Copy link
Contributor

NAMRATA-WOKE commented Sep 24, 2024

Article Details

Please enter the details here

Proposer: Sean Mcilroy | Director of Programs | @seanmcilroy29

Abstract: Applying ISO SCI 1.0 Specifications in Generative AI Workloads

Why: In the dynamic landscape of the insurance industry, companies are increasingly leveraging generative AI to enhance customer service, streamline claims processing, and develop predictive models for risk assessment. However, the deployment of these AI models comes with significant energy and carbon costs, raising concerns about their environmental impact and operational efficiency. The ISO SCI 1.0 standard offers a framework to address these challenges by providing guidelines for sustainable computing. This use case aims to demonstrate the practical implementation of the ISO SCI 1.0 standard in a high-stakes, real-world scenario within the insurance sector.

Audience: Software Engineers, Heads of Technology

Timeline: October 2024

Important Information

To be filled out later

Author: Trustwise
Other contributors: @Green-Software-Foundation/sci-contributors
Article Link:
Graphics Link:
Published Link:

Checklist

  • Idea discussed and selected for writing. After checking this box, set Status to "Todo" under "Articles" project
  • Author identified. After checking this box Assign issue to the Author
  • Scheduled in calendar
  • Google doc link created in GSF drive.
  • In progress. After checking this box, set Status to "In Progress" under "Articles" project
  • Draft created. After checking this box, set Status to "In Review" under "Articles" project. Assign issue to Reviewer/Author during the back-and-forth
  • Draft reviewed. After checking this box, set Status to "In Publishing" under "Articles" project. Assign issue to Graphic Designer and add "Graphic Design" to issue's Projects
  • Graphics created. After checking this box, assign to TBC for approval.
  • Approved. After checking this box, assign to TBC for publishing.
  • Published. After checking this box, set Status to "Ready" under "Articles" project. Assign to Marketing and add "D: Marketing" to issue's Projects
  • Shared on socials
  • Shared on newsletter. After checking this box, set Status to "Done" under "Articles" project and close issue.
@NAMRATA-WOKE NAMRATA-WOKE self-assigned this Sep 24, 2024
@NAMRATA-WOKE
Copy link
Contributor Author

Waiting for Asim and Sean to approve the Trustwise case study.

I reviewed the study, and they do share the SCI scores, their approach, and assumptions.

However, I noticed that the manifest file showing the actual calculation seems to be missing (unless pages 14-16 cover this in a different format). Also, I'm unclear if page 18 shows the SCI score post-implementation of changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant