You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, for those who have used the SCI in anger - in the SCI equation
should the boundary just be drawn around the actual hardware (i.e. servers) that code is running on for embedded emissions or do we need to consider the percentage of the entire lifetime emissions of building, maintaining and destroying the datacentre itself? Because presumably the datacentres wouldn't exist if they weren't running our code? Or do we take the handwavery approach that those are datacentre owners scope 3 and so we're not responsible?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi, for those who have used the SCI in anger - in the SCI equation
should the boundary just be drawn around the actual hardware (i.e. servers) that code is running on for embedded emissions or do we need to consider the percentage of the entire lifetime emissions of building, maintaining and destroying the datacentre itself? Because presumably the datacentres wouldn't exist if they weren't running our code? Or do we take the handwavery approach that those are datacentre owners scope 3 and so we're not responsible?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions