2024.01.24

[seanmcilroy29]

---

2024.01.24 Agenda/Minutes

---

Time: Bi-weekly @ 1600 (GMT) - See the time in your timezone

• Co-Chair - Marco Valtas (Thoughtsworks)
• Co-Chair - Chris Xie- (Futurewei)
• Convener – Sean Mcilroy (Linux Foundation)

Antitrust Policy

Joint Development Foundation meetings may involve participation by industry competitors, and the Joint Development Foundation intends to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is, therefore, extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas and be aware of and not participate in any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel or counsel to the Joint Development Foundation, DLA Piper.

Recordings

WG agreed to record all Meetings. This meeting recording will be available until the next scheduled meeting.
Meeting recording link

Roll Call

Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.

Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:

• Full Name, Affiliation, (optional) GitHub username

Agenda

• Approve agenda
• Approve previous Meeting Minutes

Introductions

• Any new members?

Submitted Issues

• The scope of SCER specification: would SCER address the specifications of data collection, and the resulted rating publication? #14
• Should SaaS be part of the software categorization?  #10
• Should these aspects of categorizing software be OR or AND relationship?  #11
• Benchmarking #12
• Examples for SCER Reference Applications and Technical Integration & Visualisation #1

Spec Review

• Proposal to discuss the Spec updates at the next WG meeting?

AOB

• Member submissions

Future meeting Agenda submissions

• If you have any Agenda submissions, please let Sean know via email [email protected] or open an Issue

Next Meeting

• 07th Feb @ 9 am P/T

Adjourn

• Motion to adjourn

---

Meeting Action Items / Standing Agenda / Future Agenda submissions

• Add here

[sk16-dev]

I couldn't quite get what I had in mind into github so I used pptx. Here are screenshots of the slides I made in an attempt to demonstrate the rating from a consumer view. It shows the benefit of having both the grade and score accessible. Look forward to everyone's thoughts tomorrow

Also, open question for the group-- if kWh consumed is the true basis of the SCI score for SCER (since energy mix in the deployment environment is unknown), should that be included in the label/rating? I think CO2e codes more information to the consumer, and should be kept, but kWh could be relevant too.

[seanmcilroy29]

attended

[chrisxie-fw]

attended

[sk16-dev]

attended