Update CI in if-plugins and if-unofficial-plugins to match if

[jmcook1186]

What
Replicate this in if-plugins and if-unofficial-plugins

Why
These changes to the CI make it easier to create a new release because they remove some fiddly manual steps and enable the creation of beta releases for testing. This will make the releases faster and less error prone.

Context
We have experienced our release process being slow and quite frustrating, especially because it has to be repeated across multiple IF repositories. It is quite brittle, and we don't currently know that a release was successful until after it is already published and this has led to some late-night rapid re-releasing on two occasions. These CI changes make the process more robust and easy to test, providing the core team with a smoother process and the community with a more reliable release schedule.

Prerequisites/resources
none

SoW (scope of work)

• In .github/workflows, nodejs-ci.yml, npm-publish.yml, release-commit.yml and release-publish.yml should be created/upodated to match the equivalent files in if. In the top level directory, .commitlintrc.js, .release-it./json and package.json should be created/updated to match their equivalents in if.

Acceptance criteria

• Given (Setup): a core team member creates a tagged release in the Github UI
  When (Action): The CI triggers an automated relkease commitand updates the version numbers and poushes directly to main
  Then: no additional manual steps are required before main can merge into release

• Given a core team member merges main into release
  When the CI triggers a release to be created automatically on npm
  Then no further manual actions are required in order to download and test the latest release

• Given a core team member wants to create a test release
  When they include beta in the release name
  Then an interim beta release is created that can be used for testing. The subsequent release has the same version numbers as the beta release but no beta tag.

[zanete]

@manushak please review the PRs

[manushak]

@manushak please review the PRs

done