-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Connection error while connecting to: ws://localhost:9999 #295
Comments
Hi , I need small help , in my case I am not able to create edges between two vertex . What exactly keys you are pressing to create edge ?? , when I am trying to hold first vertex with press e/left mouse button after that hold vertex not releasing my mouse cursor to move to second vertex . Could you please suggest , thanks in advance . |
@ashish143ti I replied to your post :) |
@KristianKarl sorry for quoting but I am still having problems with the issue of this post :( |
hello |
I'm from China ,so if you too, we can communicate in Chinese. my email is [email protected] |
Hello, Once that code fragment has been modified, you have to generate the .jar again and run it on the remote server. I think it was something like that, I hope it helps you. I'm on vacation, I'll read to you when I can. I’m from Spain :) Cheer up. |
thanks for your answer! |
I am trying to use graphwalker remotely. The service is running on a external machine, running the graphwalker studio jar. It allows to connect to the web service (http://x.x.x.x:9090/studio.html), I can design a test with different models. The problem is that it does not allow to run the paths through the model (it means, the "play" does not works):
When I try the same on the http://x.x.x.x:9090 the error message it shows is:
"Connection error while connecting to: ws://localhost:9999" in the execution bar.
If I run the studio locally, it works completely (remote service). But it has no sense to have to run the studio.jar locally for use it remotely, because I want to offer the complete service without need to execute nothing (Is it possible?).
Ports 9090 and 9999 are correctly opened in the remote machine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: