You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GraphBLAS rarely needs the kronecker product function but rather an implicit kronecker product. Something like:
kron_mxv(y, A, B, v)
This would create a result vector y as if it did the following sequence:
C=kron(A,B)
y = C*v
But it never generates C. It is possible to use the non-blocking interface for this but I wonder if we would be better off with a direct function. Otherwise, it is fairly unlikely for the implementers to anticipate this use case an capture it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GraphBLAS rarely needs the kronecker product function but rather an implicit kronecker product. Something like:
kron_mxv(y, A, B, v)
This would create a result vector y as if it did the following sequence:
But it never generates C. It is possible to use the non-blocking interface for this but I wonder if we would be better off with a direct function. Otherwise, it is fairly unlikely for the implementers to anticipate this use case an capture it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: