Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make sure links are not outdated as part of our CI process #384

Closed
dwsupplee opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Make sure links are not outdated as part of our CI process #384

dwsupplee opened this issue Mar 6, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
@dwsupplee
Labels
documentation type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor

Just a simple check to make sure links do not 404 could be very helpful
@dwsupplee dwsupplee added documentation type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. labels Mar 6, 2017
@jdpedrie
Copy link
Contributor

jdpedrie commented Mar 6, 2017

I tried working on something like this once. I was concerned that the large number of http requests to cloud.google.com could pose an issue. There were several hundred links which would need to be tested.

@dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@michaelbausor if we were to automate testing of links on a rare occasion, say when we tag a release - do you think we would run into any issues being blacklisted?

@michaelbausor
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know - I will ask around

@michaelbausor
Copy link
Contributor

There has been some progress on this, using a link checking tool created by @tmatsuo. I will investigate the additional steps necessary to get this tool checking all of our doc links.

@michaelbausor michaelbausor added the priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. label Jul 11, 2017
@danoscarmike danoscarmike removed the priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. label Aug 10, 2017
@dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Moving to the wiki

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dwsupplee dwsupplee

Labels
documentation type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@jdpedrie @dwsupplee @danoscarmike @michaelbausor