Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu #1869

Closed
rishacha opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu #1869

rishacha opened this issue Sep 29, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@stevenzeck
Labels
feature published
Milestone
v0.30.6

Comments

@rishacha
Copy link

rishacha commented Sep 29, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Description

It would be really nice if you can add a shortcut to open the settings view as part of the package sub-menu.

This is my go-to tool before I submit any piece of code for review. Appreciate the work done 👍
@rishacha rishacha changed the title [Feature] Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu [Feature] Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu Sep 29, 2017
@Glavin001 Glavin001 changed the title [Feature] Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu Add Settings shortcut to the Packages menu Oct 7, 2017
@stevenzeck
Copy link
Contributor

stevenzeck commented Oct 19, 2017 •
edited
Loading

This is a pretty simple update. I have it completed, just waiting on Linuxbrew to fix one of their formulas so Travis passes, then I'll open a PR. https://github.com/szeck87/atom-beautify/tree/add-settings-menu

I find it useful already, kind of a pain to get to a specific package's settings.

@stevenzeck stevenzeck mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2017
Merged
6 tasks
@Glavin001 Glavin001 added this to the v0.35.6 milestone Oct 30, 2017
@Glavin001
Copy link
Owner

Published to v0.30.6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stevenzeck stevenzeck

Labels
feature published
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.30.6
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@Glavin001 @stevenzeck @rishacha