Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

analysis: civic + moa variant analysis #20

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

analysis: civic + moa variant analysis #20

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2023

Conversation

korikuzma
Copy link
Member

close #8

Notes:

  • Originally from this PR
  • Focuses mainly on the variants and terms we support, don't support, and whether or not we can normalize

Focuses mainly on the variants and terms we support, don't support, and whether or not we can normalize
@korikuzma korikuzma requested review from austinant and wesleygoar June 2, 2023 18:51
@korikuzma korikuzma self-assigned this Jun 2, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@wesleygoar wesleygoar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. @austinant would love your thoughts since I have looked at this many times already.

@korikuzma korikuzma merged commit 722338f into main Jun 27, 2023
@korikuzma korikuzma deleted the issue-8 branch June 27, 2023 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Run analysis on CIViC + MOAlmanac data
2 participants