You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello! I have used braker for gene prediction with protein of close homology and RNAseq data together (Trial 1) and I ran braker separately with protein of close homology and RNAseq and combined them with TSEBRA . The BUSCO Scores of trial 1 and TSEBRA run are:
Trial 1: C: 98.6%[S:96.7%,D:1.9%],F:0.5%,M:0.9%,n:6641
TSEBRA: C:98.6%[S:92.1%,D:6.5%],F:0.3%,M:1.1%,n:6641
But the number of genes in each case is:
Trial 1: 12931
TSEBRA: 13353
I calculated the average length of the peptide sequences in both the gene predictions and they turn out to be:
Trial 1: 487 amino acids
TSEBRA: 478 amino acids
So could it be possible that the gene prediction by TSEBRA is more fragmented?
Is there any other way in which I could choose the best among both of these?
It would be great if you could help. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello! I have used braker for gene prediction with protein of close homology and RNAseq data together (Trial 1) and I ran braker separately with protein of close homology and RNAseq and combined them with TSEBRA . The BUSCO Scores of trial 1 and TSEBRA run are:
Trial 1: C: 98.6%[S:96.7%,D:1.9%],F:0.5%,M:0.9%,n:6641
TSEBRA: C:98.6%[S:92.1%,D:6.5%],F:0.3%,M:1.1%,n:6641
But the number of genes in each case is:
Trial 1: 12931
TSEBRA: 13353
I calculated the average length of the peptide sequences in both the gene predictions and they turn out to be:
Trial 1: 487 amino acids
TSEBRA: 478 amino acids
So could it be possible that the gene prediction by TSEBRA is more fragmented?
Is there any other way in which I could choose the best among both of these?
It would be great if you could help. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: