Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HZN-99] Hazen produced ghosting values do not match ImageJ values #99

Closed
laurencejackson opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #185
Closed

[HZN-99] Hazen produced ghosting values do not match ImageJ values #99

laurencejackson opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #185
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@laurencejackson
Copy link
Collaborator

Transferred by @laurencejackson on Feb 24, 2021, 16:31

:::Issue recreated from Jira issue HZN-99:::

Hazen ghosting was used to analyse images from ECH Vida acceptance testing.

The values produced by hazen did not match those produced with ImageJ, and did not match the visible ghosting seen on the images. Values produced either underestimated ghosting or over estimated (for TE=120ms, NSA=1).

Hazen produced values and ghosting attached below.

@laurencejackson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

laurencejackson commented Aug 6, 2021

Transferred by @laurencejackson on Feb 24, 2021, 16:27
image

@laurencejackson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

laurencejackson commented Aug 6, 2021

Transferred by @laurencejackson on Feb 24, 2021, 16:29

image

@hshuaib90 hshuaib90 added this to the 0.5.0 milestone Oct 29, 2021
@hshuaib90 hshuaib90 added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 29, 2021
@tomaroberts
Copy link
Collaborator

@laurencejackson

Can you possibly re-upload the screenshots you posted on 6 Aug – links appear to be broken.

@tomaroberts
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed by PR #185

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants