Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider changes to SMTP Broker #4098

Closed
1 of 7 tasks
nickumia-reisys opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
1 of 7 tasks

Consider changes to SMTP Broker #4098

nickumia-reisys opened this issue Dec 6, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@nickumia-reisys
Copy link
Contributor

nickumia-reisys commented Dec 6, 2022

User Story

In order to handle new updates to the SMTP Broker, the Data.gov maintenance team wants to assess whether the new changes to the SMTP Broker are worth incorporating.

Acceptance Criteria

[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]

  • GIVEN an assessment has been made
    WHEN the SMTP Broker is updated happens
    THEN the desired changes take effect.

Background

Security Considerations (required)

May result in new permission for the SMTP Broker, but nothing out of the ordinary.

Sketch

  • Decide whether we want the new features
    • If we DO NOT want the features,
      • Set enabled_feedback_notifications: false in the SMTP creation for catalog and inventory
    • If we DO want the features,
      • Update permissions for the SMTP broker in datagov-ssb
      • Optionally set enabled_feedback_notifications: true (the default is true, so it would just be documentation that this is enabled)
@jbrown-xentity
Copy link
Contributor

Going to take initial mitigation steps, then delay the feature integration... cc @nickumia-reisys

@nickumia-reisys
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mitigation steps complete ✔️

@nickumia-reisys
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants