Current design review

[r-bartlett-gsa]

As a benefits tool user, in order to feel confident about my interactions with the tool, I would like benefit tool to have the same and consistent styles and patterns within the tool itself and as USAGov site.

Acceptance Criteria:

• Review both USAGov (current and beta) sites and benefit tool subsite (aka BEARS)
• Review USWDS Inclusive Patterns
• Document recommendations and any inconsistencies for further prioritization

[fpigeonjr]

@r-bartlett-gsa quick question.
What sites do you mean when you mention benefit tool sites in the first acceptance criteria?

[r-bartlett-gsa]

@r-bartlett-gsa quick question. What sites do you mean when you mention benefit tool sites in the first acceptance criteria?

@fpigeonjr Good question! I update that criteria, and hopefully it's more clear. BEARS will be known as USAGov's benefit tool. So gradually I'm trying to transition from using BEARS to using benefit tool.

[fpigeonjr]

@fpigeonjr Good question! I update that criteria, and hopefully it's more clear. BEARS will be known as USAGov's benefit tool. So gradually I'm trying to transition from using BEARS to using benefit tool.

👍 Thanks @r-bartlett-gsa. This clears things up for me.

[fpigeonjr]

Scheduled review on 12-13-2022 @ 11aCST

[r-bartlett-gsa]

Design review doc