Investigate cog/over outside base years #3903
Assignees
Labels
Comments
|
This is now blocked pending further conversation with OMB. |
|
One note from OMB: we need to clearly delineate the process difference between base years and non-base years. |
|
@danswick , I'm going to unassign me from this ticket, because it is not clear that I'm driving the work on it? However, we can re-add me at any time (including right away). |
Closed
|
I think the intent of this ticket is covered in other cog/over tickets. We can/should come back here to reference the flowchart once we're ready to create public docs! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
A question has been asked about the cog/over algorithm.
Specifically, the question is: are we handling assignments outside of base years correctly?
The flow, as-is, is shown below. (The flow was previously expressed as a Mural; this is a Mermaid transcription, which would allow us to put it under version control.)
flowchart TD classDef startClass fill:#000,stroke:#CCC,color:#FFF classDef endClass fill:#000,stroke:#CCC,color:#FFF classDef info fill:#F4D03F,stroke:#CCC classDef question fill:#F39C12,stroke:#CCC classDef overInfo fill:#AED6F1,stroke:#CCC classDef cogInfo fill:#F5B7B1,stroke:#CCC A(Start):::startClass --- B[Record is <br />submitted to the FAC] B:::info --> C{Total expenditure <br />less than <br />or equal to $50M?} C:::question C -->|YES| O1 C -->|NO| C0 subgraph Oversight O1[Determine Oversight]:::overInfo O2:::question O1 --> O2 O2{Does record have\nDA expenditures?} O2 -->|NO| O4 O2 -->|YES| O3 O4:::overInfo O3:::overInfo O3[Sum DA<br />expenditures to <br />unique ALN prefixes] O4[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total funding\is oversight] O3 --> O6 O4 --> O5[End]:::endClass O6:::question O6{Does agency<br />with largest DA<br />expenditure make up<br />at least 25%<br />of total expenditure?} O6 -->|YES| O8 O6 -->|NO| O7 O8:::overInfo O7:::overInfo O8[Agency with<br />predominant DA<br />expenditure is<br />oversight] O7[Agency with<br />predominant total<br />expenditure is <br />oversight] O8 --> O9[End]:::endClass O7 --> O10[End]:::endClass end subgraph Cognizance C0:::cogInfo C1:::question C2:::cogInfo C3:::cogInfo C4:::endClass C0[Determine Cognizance] C0 --> C1{Does<br />entity exist in<br />Cog_Ref_List} C1 -->|YES| C2[Listed Cog is assigned.] C1 -->|NO| C3[Look back at base year<br />for the submission] C2 --> C4(END) C3 --> C5{Does<br />base year <br />submission exist?} C5:::question C5 -->|NO| C6 C5 -->|YES| C7 C6:::cogInfo C7:::cogInfo C7[Use submission's<br />BASE YEAR<br />DA expenditure to<br />determine Cog] C7 --> C8 C6[Use submission's<br />CURRENT YEAR<br />DA expenditure to<br />determine Cog] C6 --> C8 C8:::question C8{Does record have<br />DA expenditures?} C8 -->|NO| C10 C8 -->|YES| C9 C10:::cogInfo C9:::cogInfo C10[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total funding is Cog] C9[Sum DA<br />expenditures to<br />unique ALN prefixes] C9 --> C11 C10 --> C16[End]:::endClass C11:::question C11{Does agency<br />with largest DA<br />expenditure make<br />up at least 25%<br />of total expenditure?} C11 -->|YES| C12 C11 -->|NO| C13 C12:::cogInfo C13:::cogInfo C12[Agency with<br />predominant DA<br />expenditure is Cog] C12 --> C14[End]:::endClass C13[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total expenditure<br />is Cog] C13 --> C15[End]:::endClass endThe question is, should we do the following?
This would modify the cog portion of the algorithm. After modification, it would look like:
flowchart TD classDef startClass fill:#000,stroke:#CCC,color:#FFF classDef endClass fill:#000,stroke:#CCC,color:#FFF classDef info fill:#F4D03F,stroke:#CCC classDef question fill:#F39C12,stroke:#CCC classDef overInfo fill:#AED6F1,stroke:#CCC classDef cogInfo fill:#F5B7B1,stroke:#CCC A(Start):::startClass --- B[Record is <br />submitted to the FAC] B:::info --> C{Total expenditure <br />less than <br />or equal to $50M?} C:::question C -->|YES| O1 C -->|NO| C0 subgraph Oversight O1[Determine Oversight]:::overInfo O2:::question O1 --> O2 O2{Does record have<br />DA exepnsidtures?} O2 -->|NO| O4 O2 -->|YES| O3 O4:::overInfo O3:::overInfo O3[Sum DA<br />expenditures to<br />unique ALN prefixes] O4[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total funding\is oversight] O3 --> O6 O4 --> O5(END):::endClass O6:::question O6{Does agency<br />with largest DA<br />expenditure make up<br />at least 25%<br />of total expenditure?} O6 -->|YES| O8 O6 -->|NO| O7 O8:::overInfo O7:::overInfo O8[Agency with<br />predominant DA<br />expenditure is<br />oversight] O7[Agency with<br />predominant total<br />expenditure is <br />oversight] O8 --> O9(END):::endClass O7 --> O10(END):::endClass end subgraph Cognizance C0:::cogInfo C1:::question C2:::cogInfo C3:::cogInfo C4:::endClass C0[Determine Cognizance] C0 --> C1{Does<br />entity exist in<br />Cog_Ref_List} C1 -->|YES| C2[Listed Cog is assigned.] C1 -->|NO| C3[Look back at base year<br />for the submission] C2 --> C4(END) C3 --> C5{Does<br />base year <br />submission exist?} C5:::question C5 -->|NO| C6a C5 -->|YES| C7 C6a{Was Cog assigned<br />outside of the<br />base year?} C6a:::question C6a -->|NO| C6 C6a -->|YES| C6b C6b:::cogInfo C6b[Use the assignment made<br />outside of the base year] C6b --> C6c(END):::endClass C6:::cogInfo C7:::cogInfo C7[Use submission's<br />BASE YEAR<br />DA expenditure to<br />determine Cog] C7 --> C8 C6[Use submission's<br />CURRENT YEAR<br />DA expenditure to<br />determine Cog] C6 --> C8 C8:::question C8{Does record have<br />DA expenditures?} C8 -->|NO| C10 C8 -->|YES| C9 C10:::cogInfo C9:::cogInfo C10[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total funding is Cog] C9[Sum DA<br />expenditures to<br />unique ALN prefixes] C9 --> C11 C10 --> C16(END):::endClass C11:::question C11{Does agency<br />with largest DA<br />expenditure make<br />up at least 25%<br />of total expenditure?} C11 -->|YES| C12 C11 -->|NO| C13 C12:::cogInfo C13:::cogInfo C12[Agency with<br />predominant DA<br />expenditure is Cog] C12 --> C14(END):::endClass C13[Agency with<br />predominant amount<br />of total expenditure<br />is Cog] C13 --> C15(END):::endClass endThis ticket is to track the investigation of whether or not this update to the cog/over assignment algorithm is the right thing to do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: