Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GRASS GIS temporal framework #1

Open
mankoff opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Use GRASS GIS temporal framework #1

mankoff opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mankoff
Copy link
Member

mankoff commented Jun 4, 2019

The initial manuscript assigned each raster to the central time-stamp, even though each raster represents a time-span. The GRASS Temporal Framework [1,2,3] supports time-spans. The algorithm should be modified to take advantage of time-span data storage. Visualizing this is easy, and can be done as in [4] (see also example figure from that paper included below).

Screenshot_20190604_091752

Limitations and Issues:

  • Converting those boxes to a single numeric value for any given date or annual average is a new challenge.

  • Each pixel within the raster may have a different time-span, or be some weighted average of multiple time-stamps within the time-span. That information is not likely to even be exposed at the level where we access the data.

[1] Gebbert & Pebesma, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1306862
[2] https://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/temporalintro.html
[3] https://grass.osgeo.org/grass76/manuals/g.gui.timeline.html and
[4] Hanna /et al./, 2013 https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12238

@mankoff mankoff added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 4, 2019
@mankoff
Copy link
Member Author

mankoff commented Jun 9, 2019

The NSIDC 0731 data does include a dT GeoTIFF that gives the time offset between the nominal mid-moth date and the actual date of each pixel. The GRASS Temporal Framework provides time stamp and time span options for each raster, not for each pixel. Each day could have a mostly-null raster?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant