Allow for consistency of NCEP-sfc fields with those used in JEDI #180
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Label error. Requires at least 1 of: 0 diff, 0 diff trivial, Non 0-diff, 0 diff structural, 0-diff trivial, Not 0-diff, 0-diff, automatic, 0-diff uncoupled. Found: |
rtodling
added
enhancement
mathomp4
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to allow for us to be able to have consistency between the surface fields (vfrac, stype and vtype) between GSI and JEDI.
The present model used at NCEP uses 20 vegetation types; so does JEDI. By simply setting the nvege_type variable in the gsi.rc.tmpl and other like files we can now test between the present and new option. The new option will be put to test fully in an upcoming x-like experiment.
This also removes the fishy interpolation being done in these fields in the GSI interface; when using the 20 type case.