Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hasLosslessNormalization is too conservative #2809

Closed
MMcM opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

hasLosslessNormalization is too conservative #2809

MMcM opened this issue Jul 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@MMcM
Copy link
Contributor

MMcM commented Jul 6, 2024

The problematic case is field("p", FanType.FanOut).nest(concat(field("c1"), field("c2"))) because this normalizes to concat(field("p", FanType.FanOut).nest(field("c1")), field("p", FanType.FanOut).nest(field("c2"))), which introduces a cross-product where there wasn't one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant