You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Self-contained MWE below. On my system, this will run for about 40 epochs with the following output from nvidia-smi.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 50425 C julia-1.1.0/bin/julia 1713MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
And then suddenly will give the following output.
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 44870 C julia-1.1.0/bin/julia 11997MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
I stress that the shift in memory usage is sudden - the model will use ~2gb over many epochs, before deciding that it needs to immediately fill all available memory. Note that PIDs above are different because I killed the first process and restarted training.
This behavior occurs in other networks and prevents me from training large-scale models overnight, and also prevents other people from using the same machine for their tasks. I do not know Flux/Tracker/CuArrays internals enough to speculate on what might be going on, but would love to help debug.
using CuArrays
using Flux
using Flux: train!, onehotbatch, @epochsusing MLDatasets
functionmake_batches(data::T, batch_size::Integer)::Array{T}where T <:Tuple{AbstractArray,AbstractArray}
batches =Vector{T}()
idx_shuffled = Flux.Random.randperm(size(data[1])[end])
for idx in Iterators.partition(idx_shuffled, batch_size)
x =selectdim(data[1], length(size(data[1])), idx)
y =selectdim(data[2], length(size(data[2])), idx)
push!(batches, (x,y))
end
batches
end
data = MNIST.traindata() |>
x -> (reshape(Array{Float32}(x[1]),(28,28,1,:)),x[2]) |>
x ->make_batches(x,16) |>
x ->map(y->(y[1], onehotbatch(y[2],0:9)),x) |>
x ->map(y->gpu.(y),x)
CuArrays.allowscalar(false)
network =Chain(
Conv((3,3),1=>16,relu;pad=(1,1)),
BatchNorm(16),
Conv((3,3),16=>16;pad=(1,1)),
MeanPool((3,3); pad=(1,1)),
Conv((3,3),16=>32,relu;pad=(1,1)),
BatchNorm(32),
Conv((3,3),32=>32;pad=(1,1)),
MeanPool((3,3); pad=(1,1)),
Conv((3,3),32=>64,relu;pad=(1,1)),
BatchNorm(64),
Conv((3,3),64=>64;pad=(1,1)),
MeanPool((3,3); pad=(1,1)),
Conv((3,3),64=>128,relu;pad=(1,1)),
BatchNorm(128),
Conv((3,3),128=>128;pad=(1,1)),
MeanPool((4,4); pad=(1,1)),
x ->reshape(x,(:,size(x)[end])),
Dense(128,10),
softmax
) |> gpu
functionloss(x::AbstractArray, y::AbstractArray)::Real
y_predicted =network(x)
R =0.01f0*sum(sum(w.^2) for w inparams(network))
Flux.crossentropy(y_predicted, y) + R
end
optimizer =ADAM()
@epochs1000train!(loss, params(network), data, optimizer)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since the linked JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#137 was closed, perhaps we should close this too? Flux leans almost exclusively on CUDA for memory management, so there's not too much actionable here without big interface changes (e.g. doing everything in-place).
Self-contained MWE below. On my system, this will run for about 40 epochs with the following output from
nvidia-smi
.And then suddenly will give the following output.
I stress that the shift in memory usage is sudden - the model will use ~2gb over many epochs, before deciding that it needs to immediately fill all available memory. Note that PIDs above are different because I killed the first process and restarted training.
This behavior occurs in other networks and prevents me from training large-scale models overnight, and also prevents other people from using the same machine for their tasks. I do not know Flux/Tracker/CuArrays internals enough to speculate on what might be going on, but would love to help debug.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: