-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stop support for linux/arm(32bit) #431
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've checked other codes and documents that reference arm
(32-bit).
The only written mention of ARM support was in CHANGELOG, which wouldn't need to be corrected (need to mention for 32-bit ARM in the next release).
About build
, the following one may need to be changed at least (or the binary build will fail at release time).
The following are items that don't interfere with the development process, such as builds and releases, but that I feel should be removed to avoid confusion.
- https://github.com/da1suk8/ostracon/blob/fix/remove_arm32/crypto/vrf/internal/vrf/vrf.go#L15-L16
- https://github.com/da1suk8/ostracon/blob/fix/remove_arm32/scripts/dist.sh#L21-L23
Could you give us your opinion too, @tnasu -san?
Yes, @da1suk8 should address them in this PR. Thanks. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #431 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 65.28% 65.28% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 277 277
Lines 37842 37842
==========================================
- Hits 24707 24704 -3
- Misses 11321 11323 +2
- Partials 1814 1815 +1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM again. Thanks for your contribution.
I feel this title contains a bit of ambiguity. Because guessing that this omitted subject, one can be read as "(current Ostracon) doesn't support ARM 32-bit", which can be interpreted as if this PR fixes to support ARM 32-bit. Could you please change the title to something clearer like "Stop ... support", or "Stop support for ..."? |
Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]>
* feat: change protobuf path to original cosmos path. Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * fix: fix multisig gRPC package path error and remove unused import in gRPC define. Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * ci: stop support for linux/arm(32bit) according to Finschia/ostracon#431 Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * fix: unittest error of `TestQueryABCIHeight` Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * fix: lint error of `foundation` module Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * fix: unittest error Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * doc: update changelog Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * chore: rollback the data race problem. Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * doc: update changelog Signed-off-by: zemyblue <[email protected]> * Revert "doc: update changelog" This reverts commit 0da197d.
* tag v1.0.6 * (fixup) Move #431 into BREAKING CHANGE
Description
This PR stop support for
linux/arm
(32bit) becauselinux/arm
(32bit) is for smart devices(mobile phone etc ..), I thought it could be removed for maintenance costs.Continued support for
linux/amd64
andlinux/arm64
.This PR contains the following changes