You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think you’ve done a great job! I can see the improvements you have made since the proposal, and the components you have added to increase the social value of the project. I think contagion effect is an interesting topic to analyze.
Speaking of the layout and design, I think your poster is clean, organized and logical. The figures are properly labelled and the size of the figures is reasonable to me. I have no trouble understanding your figures. I especially like the scatterplot of the distance of cosine similarity because I can visualize the clear contagion effect shown in the plot. The research questions section clearly states the research question so that the readers can follow your poster well. It’s also great to see that you have a clear flow in the model building sections, which is really easy to understand.
In terms of other aspects, for the methods section, I would suggest using bullet points to show what kind of correlation you computed between each pair of restaurants. Also, I am wondering if there’s a more efficient way to state your results because right now, the results section may seem a little text-heavy.
Overall, I think you did a great job! Good luck!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think you’ve done a great job! I can see the improvements you have made since the proposal, and the components you have added to increase the social value of the project. I think contagion effect is an interesting topic to analyze.
Speaking of the layout and design, I think your poster is clean, organized and logical. The figures are properly labelled and the size of the figures is reasonable to me. I have no trouble understanding your figures. I especially like the scatterplot of the distance of cosine similarity because I can visualize the clear contagion effect shown in the plot. The research questions section clearly states the research question so that the readers can follow your poster well. It’s also great to see that you have a clear flow in the model building sections, which is really easy to understand.
In terms of other aspects, for the methods section, I would suggest using bullet points to show what kind of correlation you computed between each pair of restaurants. Also, I am wondering if there’s a more efficient way to state your results because right now, the results section may seem a little text-heavy.
Overall, I think you did a great job! Good luck!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: