You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In one of my working projects built on RichTextFX, I use a workflow that enables me to specify the code area language like this
CodeEditorConfiguration cfg = new XmlCodeEditorConfiguration();
CodeEditor = new CodeEditor(cfg, sampleCode);
Also, each configuration get's to specify it's style within the class (with the use of a URLStreamHandlerFactory ) thus making each configuration class more compact and self dependent. So, I'm wondering if the idea is worth a pull request or if RichTextFX would be better without it (as the above example tends to be gearing towards a code editor rather than a control that an editor can be built upon ). Additionally, I'm also considering specifying line number functionality from the editor configuration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In one of my working projects built on RichTextFX, I use a workflow that enables me to specify the code area language like this
Also, each configuration get's to specify it's style within the class (with the use of a
URLStreamHandlerFactory
) thus making each configuration class more compact and self dependent. So, I'm wondering if the idea is worth a pull request or if RichTextFX would be better without it (as the above example tends to be gearing towards a code editor rather than a control that an editor can be built upon ). Additionally, I'm also considering specifying line number functionality from the editor configuration.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: