You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When the IPv6 routing table is only about 51-52K routes.
# show bgp 2600::
BGP routing table entry for 2600::/29
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
fd65:cb82:303d:c998::a
136620 174 1239
2402:28c0:3::179 (metric 1024) from 2402:28c0:3::179 (103.105.50.12)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external
Community: 174:21000 174:22013 64512:102
Large Community: 136620:0:102
AddPath ID: RX 3, TX 172305
Last update: Fri Jun 1 01:12:22 2018
136620 174 1239
2402:28c0:3::179 (metric 1024) from 2402:28c0:3::179 (103.105.50.12)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
Community: 174:21000 174:22013 64512:102
Large Community: 136620:0:102
AddPath ID: RX 4, TX 172304
Last update: Fri Jun 1 01:12:22 2018
My IBGP peer (OpenBGPD, not shown in the config) appears to do the right thing by only receiving 51K prefixes from FRR. Am I just mis-interpreting the output or is there something going on here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am running frr_4.0-1.debian9.1_amd64.deb on Debian 9. I am peering with an upstream ISP via v6, but getting every prefix twice.
When the IPv6 routing table is only about 51-52K routes.
My IBGP peer (OpenBGPD, not shown in the config) appears to do the right thing by only receiving 51K prefixes from FRR. Am I just mis-interpreting the output or is there something going on here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: