You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed that filters that have no log levels selected (which is the default for new filters) exhibit a buggy - or at least counterintuitive - behavior.
An exclusion filter without log levels doesn't filter out any log messages, regardless of the value of the other fields. Conversely, an inclusion filter without log levels never matches a message ("All logs were filtered out" is displayed).
This behavior seems to contradict the "Empty fields will not be used during filtering" notice. If I select no log levels, I expect that the log level won't be used in filtering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've noticed that filters that have no log levels selected (which is the default for new filters) exhibit a buggy - or at least counterintuitive - behavior.
An exclusion filter without log levels doesn't filter out any log messages, regardless of the value of the other fields. Conversely, an inclusion filter without log levels never matches a message ("All logs were filtered out" is displayed).
This behavior seems to contradict the "Empty fields will not be used during filtering" notice. If I select no log levels, I expect that the log level won't be used in filtering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: