Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: issue 23908 #27190

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023
Merged

fix: issue 23908 #27190

merged 21 commits into from
Sep 15, 2023

Conversation

s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor

@s-alves10 s-alves10 commented Sep 11, 2023

Details

Show the main composer only when there is no focused message in edit mode

Fixed Issues

$ #23908
PROPOSAL: #23908 (comment)

Tests

Note: These tests are for small screen devices. Step 5 - 6 are for mobile platforms.

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat(chat C) and send two messages(message A and message B)
  3. Switch message A to edit mode
  4. Switch message B to edit mode
  5. Hide keyboard(press back button)
  6. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  7. Click the cancel button of message A
  8. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  9. Switch message A to edit mode again
  10. Open EmojiPicker on message A and close it
  11. Click message B to focus on it
  12. Click the cancel button of message A
  13. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  14. Delete all contents of message B and click Save
  15. Confirm delete modal appears and click cancel
  16. Verify that the main composer isn't shown(On ios safari, message B gets blurred and main composer is shown)
  17. Again click Save
  18. Click delete on confirm delete modal
  19. Verify that the main composer is shown
  20. Switch message A to edit mode
  21. Delete all contents of the message then click Save button and click cancel on confirm delete modal
  22. Switch to another chat and return back to chat C
  23. Click cancel in message A
  24. Verify that the message A isn't highlighted
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat(chat C) and send two messages(message A and message B)
  3. Switch message A to edit mode
  4. Switch message B to edit mode
  5. Hide keyboard(press back button)
  6. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  7. Click the cancel button of message A
  8. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  9. Switch message A to edit mode again
  10. Open EmojiPicker on message A and close it
  11. Click message B to focus on it
  12. Click the cancel button of message A
  13. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  14. Delete all contents of message B and press Enter or click Save
  15. Confirm delete modal appears and click cancel
  16. Verify that the main composer isn't shown(On ios safari, message B gets blurred and main composer is shown)
  17. Again press Enter or click Save
  18. Click delete on confirm delete modal
  19. Verify that the main composer is shown
  20. Switch message A to edit mode
  21. Click Save button and click cancel on confirm delete modal
  22. Switch to another chat and return back to chat C
  23. Click cancel in message A
  24. Verify that the message A isn't highlighted

QA Steps

  1. Open ND and log in with any account
  2. Open any chat(chat C) and send two messages(message A and message B)
  3. Switch message A to edit mode
  4. Switch message B to edit mode
  5. Hide keyboard(press back button)
  6. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  7. Click the cancel button of message A
  8. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  9. Switch message A to edit mode again
  10. Open EmojiPicker on message A and close it
  11. Click message B to focus on it
  12. Click the cancel button of message A
  13. Verify that the main composer isn't shown
  14. Delete all contents of message B and press Enter or click Save
  15. Confirm delete modal appears and click cancel
  16. Verify that the main composer isn't shown(On ios safari, message B gets blurred and main composer is shown)
  17. Again press Enter or click Save
  18. Click delete on confirm delete modal
  19. Verify that the main composer is shown
  20. Switch message A to edit mode
  21. Click Save button and click cancel on confirm delete modal
  22. Switch to another chat and return back to chat C
  23. Click cancel in message A
  24. Verify that the message A isn't highlighted
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
23908_mac_chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
23908_android_chrome.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
23908_ios_safari.mp4
Desktop
23908_mac_desktop.mp4
iOS
23908_ios_native.mp4
Android
23908_android_native.mp4

@s-alves10 s-alves10 marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2023 19:36
@s-alves10 s-alves10 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 11, 2023 19:36
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from s77rt and removed request for a team September 11, 2023 19:36
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 11, 2023

@s77rt Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]


if (isFocusedRef.current || EmojiPickerAction.isActive(props.action.reportActionID) || ReportActionContextMenu.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
setShouldShowComposeInputKeyboardAware(true);
isFocusedRef.current = true;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not seem right, why we are doing this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have discussed the new issue of re-focusing for a brief moment here. This issue is introduced when I add onMouseDown={e => e.preventDefault()} props to the save button for prevent loosing focus.

deleteDraft method is called right before unmount is called. Setting this value ensures that the current action is active. We can fix the above issue(both Enter key or Save button) by this change

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the above code. In order to prevent auto refocusing of composer input after delete modal is closed, I blurred the input element before showing the confirm modal
Please check the latest code

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want to prevent refocusing on that input if we press Delete on the delete modal right? But what if we press Close on the modal? Will the input get refocused again? (check on both web and native)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ReportActionContextMenu.showDeleteModal(props.reportID, props.action, false, deleteDraft, () => InteractionManager.runAfterInteractions(() => textInputRef.current.focus()));

We set focus in cancel handler, but it seems that focusing doesn't work on ios safari.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt

This issue already exists on staging and not a regression. Will you check again?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah not something that we should be concerned with here. Safari limit the focus functionality.

Comment on lines +377 to +383
// Clear active report action when another action gets focused
if (!EmojiPickerAction.isActive(props.action.reportActionID)) {
EmojiPickerAction.clearActive();
}
if (!ReportActionContextMenu.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
ReportActionContextMenu.clearActiveReportAction();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we do this on onBlur?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. We should keep active report action until another draft gets focused. This wasn't already confirmed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s-alves10 This is not resolved yet. Can we do this any other way?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clear active report action when another action gets focused
We shouldn't clear active action on blur because blurred action can be active.

I think we confirmed this in the proposal

Note: I guess we can clear active in onModalHide of EmojiPickerButton for EmojiPicker, and in confirm/cancel callback of showDeleteModal for ReportActionContextMenu. Please let me know your thoughts

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt

I think the new approach can cause a regression.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. I don't think this is a blocker for now. Will need to test though

src/pages/home/report/ReportActionItemMessageEdit.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
// - it is focused or
// - EmojiPicker's activeID is equal to this action's reportActionID or
// - ReportActionContextMenu's reportActionID is equal to this action's reportActionID
const isActive = useCallback((reportActionID) => isFocusedRef.current || EmojiPickerAction.isActive(reportActionID) || ReportActionContextMenu.isActiveReportAction(reportActionID), []);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB. isActive does not need to accept a parameter, the report action id will always be props.action.reportActionID

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

Comment on lines 116 to 119
// We consider the report action in edit mode is active when
// - it is focused or
// - EmojiPicker's activeID is equal to this action's reportActionID or
// - ReportActionContextMenu's reportActionID is equal to this action's reportActionID
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// We consider the report action in edit mode is active when
// - it is focused or
// - EmojiPicker's activeID is equal to this action's reportActionID or
// - ReportActionContextMenu's reportActionID is equal to this action's reportActionID
// We consider the report action active if it's focused, its emoji picker is open or its context menu is open

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

Comment on lines 138 to 140
// Skip if this is not the focused message so the other edit composer stays focused.
// In small screen devices, when EmojiPicker is shown, the current edit message will lose focus, we need to check this case as well.
if (!isFocusedRef.current && !EmojiPickerAction.isActive(props.action.reportActionID)) {
// When delete modal is opened, the current edit message will lose focus, we need to check this case as well
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comments seems outdated, please update accordingly

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

};
// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a comment for the disabled eslint rule

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

Comment on lines 231 to 239
setShouldShowComposeInputKeyboardAware(true);
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.clear();
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.focus();
if (EmojiPickerAction.isActive(props.action.reportActionID)) {
EmojiPickerAction.clearActive();
}
if (ReportActionContextMenu.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID)) {
ReportActionContextMenu.clearActiveReportAction();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to call setShouldShowComposeInputKeyboardAware, EmojiPickerAction.clearActive and ReportActionContextMenu.clearActiveReportAction here? Won't they get called on the unmount phase?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we don't need to call them here. Removed

Comment on lines -140 to +154
ComposerActions.setShouldShowComposeInput(true);
setShouldShowComposeInputKeyboardAware(true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB. Do we need to make this keyboard aware? Will this introduce any delay?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so. I think showing composer after keyboard is closed is good. If keyboard isn't visible, this would show composer immediately

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

Please take a look again

@s-alves10 s-alves10 requested a review from s77rt September 13, 2023 15:26
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 13, 2023

In step 21

Click Save button and click cancel on confirm delete modal

Please change to:
21. Delete all contents of the message then click Save button and click cancel on confirm delete modal

Comment on lines -216 to +228
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.focus();

if (isActive()) {
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.clear();
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.focus();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this may be causing a regression. Can we remove the condition here? Currently if we delete a message the focus is not set back to the main composer but it should

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that solution won't work. We still need to find a way to fix the regression though

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should focus the main composer if the deleted message is active. Please let me know if I am wrong

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's correct but apparently this is not the behavior

Screen.Recording.2023-09-14.at.5.29.25.PM.mov

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt

There were some changes recently. This is due to this PR. Let me find a way

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fixed the bug of isActiveReportAction. Now this works fine as expected

Copy link
Contributor

@techievivek techievivek Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this is resolved, right? Because I too agree the expected behaviour is that composer should get the focus.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@s-alves10 s-alves10 Sep 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, thanks.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 13, 2023

Can you specify that the tests are for mobile only as the main composer will only get hidden in mobile

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 13, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb-chrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. Delete all contents of message B and click Save
  2. Confirm delete modal appears and click cancel
  3. Verify that the main composer isn't shown

Fails on iOS Safari. Any idea the reason behind that?

Please check the chat history #27190 (comment)

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you specify that the tests are for mobile only as the main composer will only get hidden in mobile

I think these tests are for small screen devices

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

I updated the test steps accordingly. Will you check again?

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Sep 14, 2023

#27190 (comment)

@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s77rt

Please check #27190 (comment)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from techievivek September 15, 2023 10:57
@s-alves10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@techievivek

Please take a look

@techievivek
Copy link
Contributor

Taking a look.

Copy link
Contributor

@techievivek techievivek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work on this one. 🙇 @s77rt @s-alves10

@techievivek techievivek merged commit 2427a06 into Expensify:main Sep 15, 2023
15 of 16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/techievivek in version: 1.3.71-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.3.71-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Comment on lines +141 to +145
// When active action changes, we need to update the `isContextMenuActive` state
const isActiveReportActionForMenu = ReportActionContextMenu.isActiveReportAction(props.action.reportActionID);
useEffect(() => {
setIsContextMenuActive(isActiveReportActionForMenu);
}, [isActiveReportActionForMenu]);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this effect depends on temporary data it is not synced with the lifecycle of other components creating inconsistencies between states of components. It caused #28029

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants