[HOLD for payment 2024-10-24] [$250][Search v2.1] Remove Search filter multi-select list headers

[luacmartins]

Coming from here, we should remove the list headers for the following Search filters:

• Expense type
• Tag
• Category
• Currency
• Tax rate

Additionally, we should add a Virtual flag to indicate that a specific card is a virtual card

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @zanyrenney

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @zanyrenney (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.49-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Remove list headers #50655

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-24. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @fedirjh requires payment through NewDot Manual Requests

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@fedirjh] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@fedirjh] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@fedirjh] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@fedirjh] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@fedirjh] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@zanyrenney] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[zanyrenney]

@luacmartins can you clarify the payment amount in your issues like this, so it helps the BZ team to know what amount to state in the payment summary? Cheers!

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Could not update price automatically because there is no linked Upwork Job ID. The BZ team member will need to update the price manually in Upwork.

[luacmartins]

Ah yea, not sure why the automation didn't add the price to it (I added it to the title now), but this is the standard $250.

[zanyrenney]

Cool thanks for clarifying @luacmartins

[zanyrenney]

Payment summary

$250 to @fedirjh - please request via ND Manual Requests. Thanks!

[melvin-bot]

@luacmartins @zanyrenney Be sure to fill out the Contact List!

[garrettmknight]

$250 approved for @fedirjh