-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Taxes - Inconsistency in leading 0 in saving tax rate #39082
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Taxes - Inconsistency in leading 0 in saving tax rate What is the root cause of that problem?Here In the What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Add below code here
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Add new
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Remove this line and use |
reviewing now! |
Could not repro, and low value |
@dylanexpensify It still reproducible Screen.Recording.2024-04-03.at.00.43.57.mov |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: 1.4.57-2
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Issue found when executing PR #38733
Action Performed:
Precondition:
Expected Result:
There should be consistency whether leading 0 in tax rate should be preserved
Actual Result:
In Step 5, 0 is preserved in adding tax rate flow
In Step 9, 0 is not preserved in edit existing tax rate flow
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Add any screenshot/video evidence
Bug6428827_1711552910550.20240327_231650.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: