refactor: extracted chat and step from cli.py into new chat.py

[ErikBjare]

Important

Refactor chat and step functions into chat.py and move interrupt handling to interrupt.py for better code organization.

• Refactoring:
  • Extracted chat and step functions from cli.py to chat.py.
  • Moved interrupt handling logic to new interrupt.py.
• Imports:
  • Updated imports in cli.py to reflect new file structure.
• Tests:
  • Updated test_server.py to import init from init.py instead of cli.py.

^{This description was created by for cafed49. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to cafed49 in 13 seconds

More details

• Looked at 936 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. gptme/chat.py:32

• Draft comment:
  The TODO comment suggests moving this function to a separate file. Since this refactoring already moved it to chat.py, consider updating or removing this comment.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The refactoring seems to have been done correctly, but there are some minor issues with the code style and consistency.

2. gptme/chat.py:251

• Draft comment:
  The regex pattern uses backticks incorrectly for escaping. Use triple backticks for code blocks in markdown, not single backticks.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The refactoring seems to have been done correctly, but there are some minor issues with the code style and consistency.

3. gptme/chat.py:302

• Draft comment:
  The backticks used here for code blocks are incorrect. Use triple backticks for markdown code blocks.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The refactoring seems to have been done correctly, but there are some minor issues with the code style and consistency.

4. gptme/chat.py:347

• Draft comment:
  The backticks used here for code blocks are incorrect. Use triple backticks for markdown code blocks.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The refactoring seems to have been done correctly, but there are some minor issues with the code style and consistency.

Workflow ID: wflow_UWBV2mMHKFM8YuK1

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 87.35632% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.46%. Comparing base (1a7e4ef) to head (352f1be).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
gptme/chat.py	86.62%	21 Missing ⚠️
gptme/config.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #158      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.37%   80.46%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          54       56       +2     
  Lines        3281     3297      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         2637     2653      +16     
  Misses        644      644              

Flag	Coverage Δ
anthropic/claude-3-haiku-20240307	79.40% <87.35%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
openai/gpt-4o-mini	79.19% <87.35%> (+0.10%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.