-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Krishna to agro prj patterns for #1228 #1330
Conversation
Ran dosdp run per previous commit with current class substitution.
This reverts commit e74d8aa.
This reverts commit 0064be2.
This reverts commit d8e1124.
See issues from list for classes added: Chemical Concentration [CC] closes #369 closes #394 closes #401 closes #402 closes #403 closes #404 closes #405 closes #406 closes #407 closes #408 closes #409 closes #410 closes #411 closes #412 closes #414 Entity Attribute Location [EAL] closes #367 closes #370 closes #371 closes #372 closes #373 closes #374 closes #396 closes #413 closes #429
Corrected previous commit's EAL pattern ids Imported pato term: duration Added class 'hours of sunshine' using EA pattern and revised label to correct string
Added classes: - water infiltration - soil water infiltration
Added classes: - exchangeable potassium - exchangeable ion
relation to 'CEC'
Added patterns for classes: - exchangeable potassium content in soil - residual water content in soil - exchangeable calcium content in soil
Imported PATO term corrected EA IRI
I will look into it CDNO reported the same CompositionalDietaryNutritionOntology/cdno#97 |
Class curation report for your information @marieALaporte @KrishnaTO
|
I also note that there is an irregular file |
I'm guessing the intermediate file here was created using the ENVO-Robot-template-and-merge-workflow? If it says only to commit the changes |
I guess seed.txt is another residual file to be removed |
'http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_09000029 ' breaks the reasoner (malformed logic) and is imported from the EAL module. I'm deleting the line in the EAL and noting the ID is used for a manually added term. Not great, but we need an SOP on fixing / removing pattern-based terms from the modules. EDIT:
<!-- http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_09000028 -->
<owl:Class rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_09000028">
<owl:equivalentClass>
<owl:Class>
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_02500034"/>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0000052"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom>
<owl:Class>
<owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00002006"/>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000050"/>
<owl:someValuesFrom rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_00001998"/>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</owl:Class>
</owl:someValuesFrom>
</owl:Restriction>
</owl:intersectionOf>
</owl:Class>
</owl:equivalentClass>
<obo:IAO_0000115 rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">The evaporation of a liquid water when measured in soil.</obo:IAO_0000115>
<oboInOwl:hasExactSynonym rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">soil liquid water evaporation</oboInOwl:hasExactSynonym>
<rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">evaporation of liquid water in soil</rdfs:label>
</owl:Class>
|
…IDs commented out in EAL txt module file
@KrishnaTO @marieALaporte please be more careful when using patterns Your ENVO:09000021 and ENVO:09000020 duplicated existing classes and require considerable time to hunt down and fix. Your ENVO:09000029 and ENVO:09000028 (noted above) have now also deregularised our EAL.txt file. Those classes will be created (manually with the same IDs), but may be obsoleted with fresh IDs down the line. |
Stuff left to do:
|
Now, this will be interesting: some of the other PRs from @KrishnaTO have not been merged yet, so classes like "runoff", mentioned in the module CSVs will not be available. I wonder what's going to happen... |
@pbuttigieg Just to confirm, ENVO:09000021 and ENVO:09000020 were pre-existing EAL patterns, if you look at the history of the file. If the duplicate issue you're referring to is the failed check, we didn't work on either of those entities. |
Closes #1228
Closes #1323 (en passant)