Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add gradient calculation for the covariance between points in GPyModelWrapper #347

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
49f5389
Add covariance between points gradient and vectorize covariance gradi…
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
d0e25c8
Add tests for the gradients
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
bda97ad
Fix shapes in gradient tests
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
6738faa
Merge branch 'master' into gradients-for-covariance-gpy
apaleyes Mar 9, 2021
6ed9094
Rewrite the covariance gradient calculation code
BrunoKM Apr 12, 2021
e7b436b
Add covariance between points gradient and vectorize covariance gradi…
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
8e16990
Add tests for the gradients
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
38a0691
Fix shapes in gradient tests
BrunoKM Feb 17, 2021
d6d6b0f
Rewrite the covariance gradient calculation code
BrunoKM Apr 12, 2021
5bd6383
Merge branch 'gradients-for-covariance-gpy' of github.com:BrunoKM/emu…
BrunoKM Apr 12, 2021
d34de42
Merge branch 'main' into gradients-for-covariance-gpy
apaleyes Jun 11, 2021
fe9b0d7
Merge branch 'main' into gradients-for-covariance-gpy
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
bcf4416
Fix typos and remove redundant args in doc-strings
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
26960ee
Fix typo in emukit/model_wrappers/gpy_model_wrappers.py
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
2bb36d2
Rename variable names to be more informative and verbose in dSigma()
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
9d52426
Add futher documentation to gradients of covariance calculations
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
c8b9f83
Add an interface for differentiable cross-covariance models
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
f345342
Incorporate interface into GPyModel
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
c280f6d
Merge branch 'gradients-for-covariance-gpy' of github.com:BrunoKM/emu…
BrunoKM Jan 1, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
72 changes: 56 additions & 16 deletions emukit/model_wrappers/gpy_model_wrappers.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -61,6 +61,19 @@ def get_joint_prediction_gradients(self, X: np.ndarray) -> Tuple[np.ndarray, np.
dvariance_dx = dSigma(X, self.model.X, self.model.kern, self.model.posterior.woodbury_inv)
return dmean_dx, dvariance_dx

def get_covariance_between_points_gradients(self, X1: np.ndarray, X2: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Computes and returns model gradients of the covariance between outputs at points X1 and X2 with respect
to X1.

:param X1: points to compute gradients at, nd array of shape (q1, d)
:param X2: points for the covariance of which to compute the gradient, nd array of shape (q2, d)
:return: gradient of the covariance matrix of shape (q1, q2) between outputs at X1 and X2
(return shape is (q1, q2, q1, d)).
"""
dcov_dx1 = dCov(X1, X2, self.model.X, self.model.kern, self.model.posterior.woodbury_inv)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Three inputs come directly from the model. I wander if it makes sense to just pass model in. Or not extract dCov as a stateless method at all. COnisder this: all this method is doing is just calling dCov, literally nothing else. And so far dCov is only used here. It seems pretty specific to me to not get reused. Is that impression correct?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that's fair to say, I was primarily just trying to mirror the implementation of dSigma that was already in the module. Happy to not separate it out.

return dcov_dx1

def set_data(self, X: np.ndarray, Y: np.ndarray) -> None:
"""
Sets training data in model
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -171,24 +184,23 @@ def dSigma(x_predict: np.ndarray, x_train: np.ndarray, kern: GPy.kern, w_inv: np
:return: Gradient of the posterior covariance of shape (q, q, q, d)
"""
q, d, n = x_predict.shape[0], x_predict.shape[1], x_train.shape[0]
dkxX_dx = np.empty((q, n, d))
dkxx_dx = np.empty((q, q, d))
# Tensor for the gradients of (q, n) covariance matrix between x_predict and x_train with respect to
# x_predict (of shape (q, d))
dkxX_dx = np.zeros((d, q*q, n))
# Tensor for the gradients of full covariance matrix at points x_predict (of shape (q, q) with respect to
# x_predict (of shape (q, d))
dkxx_dx = np.zeros((d, q*q, q))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Naming here is a bit unfortunate. I know it was already there, but do you have any ideas how to improve it? the only way to tell the two vars apart is one upper/lower case X, and that's so poor to read

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I renamed it to something more verbose, let me know if you prefer it!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to improve it, let me know what you think!

for i in range(d):
dkxX_dx[:, :, i] = kern.dK_dX(x_predict, x_train, i)
dkxx_dx[:, :, i] = kern.dK_dX(x_predict, x_predict, i)
dkxX_dx[i, ::q + 1, :] = kern.dK_dX(x_predict, x_train, i)
dkxx_dx[i, ::q + 1, :] = kern.dK_dX(x_predict, x_predict, i)
dkxX_dx = dkxX_dx.reshape((d, q, q, n))
dkxx_dx = dkxx_dx.reshape((d, q, q, q))
dkxx_dx += dkxx_dx.transpose((0, 1, 3, 2))
dkxx_dx.reshape((d, q, -1))[:, :, ::q + 1] = 0.

K = kern.K(x_predict, x_train)

dsigma = np.zeros((q, q, q, d))
for i in range(q):
for j in range(d):
Ks = np.zeros((q, n))
Ks[i, :] = dkxX_dx[i, :, j]
dKss_dxi = np.zeros((q, q))
dKss_dxi[i, :] = dkxx_dx[i, :, j]
dKss_dxi[:, i] = dkxx_dx[i, :, j].T
dKss_dxi[i, i] = 0
dsigma[:, :, i, j] = dKss_dxi - Ks @ w_inv @ K.T - K @ w_inv @ Ks.T
return dsigma
dsigma = dkxx_dx - K @ w_inv @ dkxX_dx.transpose((0, 1, 3, 2)) - dkxX_dx @ w_inv @ K.T
return dsigma.transpose((2, 3, 1, 0))


def dmean(x_predict: np.ndarray, x_train: np.ndarray, kern: GPy.kern, w_vec: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
Expand All @@ -210,6 +222,34 @@ def dmean(x_predict: np.ndarray, x_train: np.ndarray, kern: GPy.kern, w_vec: np.
dmu[j, j, i] = (dkxX_dx[j, :, i][None, :] @ w_vec[:, None]).flatten()
return dmu


def dCov(x1: np.ndarray, x2: np.ndarray, x_train: np.ndarray, kern: GPy.kern, w_inv: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Compute the derivative of the posterior covariance matrix between prediction inputs x1 and x2
(of shape (q1, q2)) with respect to x1

:param x1: Prediction inputs of shape (q1, d)
:param x2: Prediction inputs of shape (q2, d)
:param x_train: Training inputs of shape (n, d)
:param kern: Covariance of the GP model
:param w_inv: Woodbury inverse of the posterior fit of the GP
:return: nd array of shape (q1, q2, q1, d) representing the gradient of the posterior covariance between x1 and x2,
where res[:, :, i, j] is the gradient of the covariance between outputs at x1 and x2 with respect to x1[i, j]
"""
q1, q2, d, n = x1.shape[0], x2.shape[0], x1.shape[1], x_train.shape[0]
dkx1X_dx = np.zeros((d, q1*q1, n))
dkx1x2_dx = np.zeros((d, q1*q1, q2))
for i in range(d):
dkx1X_dx[i, ::q1 + 1, :] = kern.dK_dX(x1, x_train, i)
dkx1x2_dx[i, ::q1 + 1, :] = kern.dK_dX(x1, x2, i)
dkx1X_dx = dkx1X_dx.reshape((d, q1, q1, n))
dkx1x2_dx = dkx1x2_dx.reshape((d, q1, q1, q2))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Naming here is hard to get through: dkx1X? Can it be improved?


K_Xx2 = kern.K(x_train, x2)
dcov = dkx1x2_dx - dkx1X_dx @ w_inv @ K_Xx2
return dcov.transpose((2, 3, 1, 0))


class GPyMultiOutputWrapper(IModel, IDifferentiable, ICalculateVarianceReduction, IEntropySearchModel):
"""
A wrapper around GPy multi-output models.
Expand Down
53 changes: 53 additions & 0 deletions tests/emukit/models/test_gpy_model_wrappers.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
import GPy
import numpy as np
import pytest

from emukit.model_wrappers.gpy_model_wrappers import GPyModelWrapper


@pytest.fixture
def test_data(gpy_model):
np.random.seed(42)
return np.random.randn(5, gpy_model.X.shape[1])


@pytest.fixture
def test_data2(gpy_model):
np.random.seed(42)
return np.random.randn(4, gpy_model.X.shape[1])


def test_joint_prediction_gradients(gpy_model, test_data):
epsilon = 1e-5
mean, cov = gpy_model.predict_with_full_covariance(test_data)
# Get the gradients
mean_dx, cov_dx = gpy_model.get_joint_prediction_gradients(test_data)

for i in range(test_data.shape[0]): # Iterate over each test point
for j in range(test_data.shape[1]): # Iterate over each dimension
# Approximate the gradient numerically
perturbed_input = test_data.copy()
perturbed_input[i, j] += epsilon
mean_perturbed, cov_perturbed = gpy_model.predict_with_full_covariance(perturbed_input)
mean_dx_numerical = (mean_perturbed - mean) / epsilon
cov_dx_numerical = (cov_perturbed - cov) / epsilon
# Check that numerical approx. similar to true gradient
assert pytest.approx(mean_dx_numerical.ravel(), abs=1e-8, rel=1e-2) == mean_dx[:, i, j]
assert pytest.approx(cov_dx_numerical, abs=1e-8, rel=1e-2) == cov_dx[:, :, i, j]


def test_get_covariance_between_points_gradients(gpy_model, test_data, test_data2):
epsilon = 1e-5
cov = gpy_model.get_covariance_between_points(test_data, test_data2)
# Get the gradients
cov_dx = gpy_model.get_covariance_between_points_gradients(test_data, test_data2)

for i in range(test_data.shape[0]): # Iterate over each test point
for j in range(test_data.shape[1]): # Iterate over each dimension
# Approximate the gradient numerically
perturbed_input = test_data.copy()
perturbed_input[i, j] += epsilon
cov_perturbed = gpy_model.get_covariance_between_points(perturbed_input, test_data2)
cov_dx_numerical = (cov_perturbed - cov) / epsilon
# Check that numerical approx. similar to true gradient
assert pytest.approx(cov_dx_numerical, abs=1e-8, rel=1e-2) == cov_dx[:, :, i, j]