Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get rid of async #169

Closed
Jake-Shadle opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Get rid of async #169

Jake-Shadle opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Jake-Shadle
Copy link
Member

While async is nice in some cases, it really just gets in the way, particularly for making everything truly parallel instead of just concurrent, I think we could get better throughput by just using a blocking reqwest client and using rayon for parallelization.
@Jake-Shadle Jake-Shadle added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 3, 2022
@Jake-Shadle
Copy link
Member Author

Resolved by #168

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Jake-Shadle