Skip to content

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

Sign in

Sign up

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

ERGA-consortium / EARs Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 23
Star 11

Code
Issues 2
Pull requests 3
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Wiki
Security
Insights

Reviewers section

Jump to bottom

Diego De Panis edited this page Feb 13, 2024 · 14 revisions

.

Toggle table of contents Pages 8

Home
About the quality standard
Assembly reviewing method using EARs
Creating your EAR
Getting your assembly reviewed using the EAR
Reviewers section
Structure of the EAR pdf
Supervisors (assignee) section

EARs wiki

What is an EAR?
Genome Assembly Standards
- EBP quality standard
The EAR pdf
The reviewing method
- Results needed
Creating your EAR
- Option A
- Option B
- Option C
- Option D
Getting your assembly reviewed
- Outcome
For Reviewers
For Supervisors

Clone this wiki locally

Footer

Footer navigation

Terms
Privacy
Security
Status
Docs
Contact

You can’t perform that action at this time.