You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, all sequences are considered as viruses that are reported as "phages" by PPR-Meta. However, we can additionally filter by a "phage score" provided by the tool:
I checked this for the Kleiner and Neto data set. Kleiner is not affected at all (because we combine PPRmeta results with VF results anyway) but some changes for Neto:
For Neto we reduce the number of unclassified contigs from 105 to 92. We also lose some Imitervirales annotations though.
I would still do this and implement a parameter for the PPR-Meta filtering and not just taking all hits that are phage into account. A good default seems >0.7
Currently, all sequences are considered as viruses that are reported as "phages" by PPR-Meta. However, we can additionally filter by a "phage score" provided by the tool:
This is also done here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: