Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qin.zhao/2009/i89-ASSERT-review.diff #93

Closed
derekbruening opened this issue Nov 27, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

qin.zhao/2009/i89-ASSERT-review.diff #93

derekbruening opened this issue Nov 27, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@derekbruening
Copy link
Contributor

From [email protected] on March 23, 2009 11:16:56

This modification tries to solve issue #89: ASSERT ( r94 ls) CURIOSITY(ma->start + ma->os_data.alignment == base) at os.c:3549
Fix it by

  1. only check module overlap if it is not vdso segment in find_executable_vm_areas.
  2. add base == vsyscall_page_start in mmap_check_for_module_overlap
  3. add note in find_executable_vm_areas, mmap_check_for_module_overlap, and process_mmap for possible issues to be solved.

stats: 127 diff lines

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/dynamorio/issues/detail?id=93

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant