You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Split from #1729 as something we will not bother to solve in the near future.
With multiple predicated memrefs in a bb, the offline trace's compressed single per-bb PC entry won't identify which memref corresponds to which load or store. Thus the ifetch and memref entries inside the bb may be in a different order.
To fully handle this we'd probably want to insert a PC entry before each predicated memref. We'd put this under an option for those who care about such accuracy and are willing to pay the extra overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Split from #1729 as something we will not bother to solve in the near future.
With multiple predicated memrefs in a bb, the offline trace's compressed single per-bb PC entry won't identify which memref corresponds to which load or store. Thus the ifetch and memref entries inside the bb may be in a different order.
To fully handle this we'd probably want to insert a PC entry before each predicated memref. We'd put this under an option for those who care about such accuracy and are willing to pay the extra overhead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: