Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACAD_TABLE Implementation #313

Open
DomCR opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 Discussed in #312 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #314
Open

ACAD_TABLE Implementation #313

DomCR opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 Discussed in #312 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #314
Labels
feature New feature added

Comments

@DomCR
Copy link
Owner

DomCR commented Mar 18, 2024

Discussed in #312

Originally posted by tardisconsole March 18, 2024
Hi,

I'm writing an import tool that simply needs to parse some content text contained in a table inside a DWG.
Using AcadSharp, I can see virtually everything except the table data. Reading some other discussions relating to ACAD_TABLE, it seems this has not yet been implemented.

Doing a foreach through the document entities, I have found BlockRecord entries that match the majority of the content text contained in the table, but there are cases where the content text in the table is an empty string. These entries are not included in the BlockRecord list when reading in the DWG file. Because of this, it's impossible to tell where the empty strings are when running through the list.

Will ACAD_TABLE support be available soon? Just a list of entities with grid row/column references and the content text would essentially solve my issue.
Or alternatively, is there a way of including the empty BlockRecord entries (if they exist)?

Thank you.

@DomCR DomCR added enhancement New feature or request feature New feature added and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Mar 18, 2024
@DomCR DomCR linked a pull request Mar 18, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@NeilWBruce
Copy link

Is there any update on this? Seems like a lot of the work was done but has been left in a pull request since March?

@DomCR
Copy link
Owner Author

DomCR commented Nov 26, 2024

Hi @NeilWBruce,

The Table has a lot of properties and subclasses but the dxf information is limited, I wrote a start but it was a big time consuming so I stopped the work.

I'll retake this one shortly.

@NeilWBruce
Copy link

Thank you, I've managed to work around it for now by exporting the data to CSV but it be great to grab it straight from the Table but yeah the standard looks very complex.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature added
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants