You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 6, 2024. It is now read-only.
DashLiveSIM is using segment 1..n filename number in a fragment sequencenumber field. This is fine if m4s file had just one moof/mdat fragment pair. Having multiple pairs such as a low-latency live test then seqnum should be incremented inside the m4s file per fragment pair.
Should this numbering be a global or can it be reset(=step backward a little bit) after each m4s segment file? This is something to think about and affects the overall implementation. Global numbering need more changes in a source code.
The SequenceNumber value for a fragment that appears later in the timeline MUST be greater than the value for a fragment that appears earlier in the timeline, but SequenceNumber values for consecutive fragments are not required to be consecutive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We discussed this in the DASH-IF live task force meeting on Nov. 16.
A globally growing sequence number cannot be combined with AST = 1970 and fragment duration less than 0.36s. Furthermore, it is only the segments which are addressable, while fragments are only interesting as part of a segment, so it was concluded that we could try to use increasing sequence number inside each segments, but let the sequence number inside the segment increase nicely.
In general, I don't think that any player really uses these sequencenumbers for anything useful.
As a summary, let's go for increasing segment numbers inside the segments, but let the sequence number of the first moof header increase by one between segments.
DashLiveSIM is using segment 1..n filename number in a fragment sequencenumber field. This is fine if m4s file had just one
moof/mdat
fragment pair. Having multiple pairs such as a low-latency live test then seqnum should be incremented inside the m4s file per fragment pair.Should this numbering be a global or can it be reset(=step backward a little bit) after each m4s segment file? This is something to think about and affects the overall implementation. Global numbering need more changes in a source code.
The SequenceNumber value for a fragment that appears later in the timeline MUST be greater than the value for a fragment that appears earlier in the timeline, but SequenceNumber values for consecutive fragments are not required to be consecutive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: