-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathGovernmentBehaviors .htm
232 lines (228 loc) · 15.2 KB
/
GovernmentBehaviors .htm
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en-US">
<head>
<title>FBI Cover-up Unabomber CIA NSA Conspiracy VanPac Echelon</title>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<meta name="Description" CONTENT="Startling expose of the Unabomber FBI Cover-up. Evidence Planting, fabrications, lies, the inevitable patsy, and the witness objections to the frame-up">
<meta name="Keywords" CONTENT="Cover-up, Most wanted, Unabomber, VanPac, CIA, NSA, FBI, Conspiracy, Echelon, Bomb, Unabom, NYC Police Dept">
<meta name="Abstract" CONTENT="Startling expose of the Unabomber FBI Cover-up. Evidence Planting, fabrications, lies, the inevitable patsy, and the witness objections to the frame-up">
<meta name="Distribution" CONTENT="Global">
<meta name="Revisit-After" content="14 Days">
<meta name="Robots" CONTENT="All">
<style>
body {
margin: auto;
line-height:1.25;
}
p { font-family: times, serif; font-size: 14pt; align: center }
p.lead { margin: 0.1in 0.2in; }
p.quote { margin: 0.0in 0.2in 0.1in; }
p.intro { margin: 0.0in 0.2in 0.0in; }
p.bible { margin: 0.0in auto 0.0in; }
p.story { margin: 0.00in 0.2in 0.0in 0.2in; }
h1 {FONT-SIZE: 16pt; FONT-FAMILY: times, serif; font-face: Bold; margin: 0.2in 0.2in 0.1in;}
.horizontalscroll{
overflow-x: scroll;
overflow-y: hidden;
}
.menu{
columns: 6 100px;
margin: 0 auto;
list-style: none;
}
.bible{
text-align:center;
margin-top:0 auto;
width:250px;
}
@media only screen and (min-width: 762px) {
body {
width: 762px;
margin:0 auto;
}
p.story { margin: 0.1in 0.0in 0.0in 0.1in }
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p class="lead" align="center"><BR>Understanding Unabom provides
in depth insight into the activities of the FBI and CIA before September 11th 2001. Activities that
included the <b>manufacture</b> and <b>management</b> of a
series of high profile, random terrorist events and selective assassinations. Without
the extensive conditioning of the system conducted under Unabom, 911 would never have succeeded. The
facts of Unabom have been covered up in a blizzard of ridicule akin to Kennedy's
grassy knoll. Covered up, despite a wide trail of
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">undeniable proof</span>
and multiple witnesses.<br>
They are presented here.</p>
<ul class="menu">
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SketchMid.htm">HOME</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/News/97-11-11-USA-Graysmith-1.htm#BankDeposit">DEPOSIT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SketchMid.htm">MORPH</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/Witnesses.htm">WITNESSES</a></li>
<li><a href="http://unabombers.com/WoodenGearParty.htm">PARTY</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SpellitSurvey.htm">MINDCONTROL</a></li>
</ul>
<br>
<p class="story" align="center"><a href="http://groups.google.com/groups?q=unabom*+group:alt.fan.unabomber&hl=en&safe=off&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=B4B47BA1.1527%25hoffman%40hoffman-info.com">
<font size="2">A VIEW ON THE ARREST</font></a></p><br>
<p class="bible">Why not say then..."Let us do evil, so that good may result"? Deservedly are such talkers condemned.</p>
<p class="bible"><i><small>The Holy Bible Romans 3:8</small></i></p>
<p class="lead"><b>The following questions need to be answered about the government's case:</b></p>
<a id="BankDeposit"></a>
<h1>1) How did Kaczynski get from Sacramento to Helena, Montana in 2 hours ?</h1>
<p class="story">On Dec 11, 1985 a bomb placed in a
Sacramento parking lot by the Unabomber killed Hugh Scrutton. The same
afternoon Kaczynski pedaled into Helena and deposited the grand sum of $10.00
in his bank account, creating
a date time stamp placing him 25 hours away from the site of the bombing <a href="News/97-11-11-USA-Graysmith-1.htm#BankDeposit">[USA Today]</a>.
The FBI's reaction to this was to say they were unable to determine if he made
the deposit himself. Huh?</p>
<a id="NoDrill"></a>
<h1>2) How did Kaczynski make the bombs ?</h1>
<p class="story">He had no
oxyacetylene torch but the bombs all showed evidence of 6300-degree
oxyacetylene welds <a href="News/97-11-11-USA-Graysmith-1.htm#NoDrill">[USA Today]</a>. Kaczynski had no electricity and no power drill
although the bombs had precisely drilled fittings to secure the metal end caps.
All but two of the bombs had over-soldering. Kaczynski had solder in the cabin
but no soldering iron. How did he do it ?</p>
<h1>3) Why is the "Nathan R" author <span style="text-decoration: underline;">never identified</span> ?</h1>
<p class="story">If the government claims someone else wrote the famous note then who? Where is the
handwriting match? I believe that few people curl an N the way I do <a href="NathanRNote.htm">[Nathan R Note]</a>.
Why not even a human-interest story about the clerk who wrote the famous note?
Additionally, the Nathan R note was not a bleed through impression as has
been reported in the Press. I recorded the note directly with a pen without
ink. During the writing of the note the surface slipped when the pen caught on
the completion of the top of the R causing a second down stroke motion to
complete the letter. The surface slipped again at the start of the W. While no
slip marks show in the photo they should be apparent in an actual examination of
the real note. Why not release the note for independent examination to verify or dispute
this claim ?</p>
<a id="NoSean"></a>
<h1>4) Why is the person with the Unabomber ID SS# <span style="text-decoration: underline;">never identified</span> ?</h1>
<p class="story">He must have met the real Unabomber in a setting that
allowed the bomber to gain the individuals
Social Security Number <a href="News/95-07-30-LAT-PureWood-1a.htm#UBID">[LA Times]</a>. Why has this never been adequately explained ?
Why not even a confidential interview by the press about who, what,
when, where, and most importantly HOW. Also, how has this person managed to stay
"disappeared" for over seven years ? If the individual was Sean and he
put two and two together during the interview, was he killed right out of the
interview to silence him ? Why not release the name of this individual now ?</p>
<a id="Witness"></a>
<h1>5) Why is the witness who saw the Unabomber <span style="text-decoration: underline;">never identified</span> ?</h1>
<p class="story">The witness
is reported as willing to participate in a
lineup <a href="News/96-04-11-WP-Witness-RoadHazzard-1.htm#Witness">[Washington Post]</a>, then <b>no lineup was ever reported in the press</b>. No witness reactions have ever been
described. Why ? If Kaczynski is the one and only bomber, then why can't this person be identified or
at least confidentially interviewed ? Was the witness ever shown a picture of Dettling given the
credibility level of my charges (3 polygraphs and multiple witness corroborations) ?</p>
<a id="JustWitness"></a>
<h1>6) Why did the FBI repeatedly refuse the witness's requests for a new sketch for 7 years ?</h1>
<p class="story">The FBI Finally relented when the witness threatened to go public. The history of the sketch
and the FBI is highly suspicious. At a time when they were spending millions on Task forces, Computers, Lawyers
ad nauseum, they actually (bizarrely) claimed budgetary restrictions on spending funds for a single days work for
a competent artist to get an accurate sketch !
The first sketches by FBI artists looked very similar to Kaczynski <a href="SketchComparisons.htm">[Sketches]</a>.
Why the telling observation by the witness that "Never mind what I think I saw. They'll tell me what I saw, and when I tell them it's off
base, they'll just tell me again. <a href="BoylanOnWitness.htm#JustWitness">[Portraits of Guilt]</a>
Why did the witness have to go outside the FBI for a sketch artist, and then have
to threaten the FBI with going public about their behavior if they did not use
theaccurate one (according several reports). This sounds like the eyewitness
is not obsessed with hiding as the FBI actions imply, on the contrary, it
implies that they are obsessed with hiding the witness for their own reasons.</p>
<a id="PhotoDucker"></a>
<h1>7) Why is the photo of the individual spotted at the Murray bombing never released to the public ?</h1>
<p class="story">Why was the search abandoned so abruptly ? When an individual
who matched the description was seen fleeing the video cameras, local police certainly had an interest, why not the feds ?
Sacramento Homicide Detective Gardner's comments on the issue are telling and worth a listen: <a href="Sounds/SoundFiles/GardnerMore.wav">[Phone Interview]</a>
, More on Gardner's Reactions <a href="Sounds/Garner-No_ID.wav">[Phone Interview2]</a>
<a href="GardnerComment.htm">[Commentary]</a>).
Given Dettling's apparent pre-disposition to flaunt evidence in front of
unwitting individuals, an appearance at the last bombing could be considered to
be in character. The
age explanation is totally absurd,...even <B>bizarre</B>, as a reason to abandon such a promising lead <a href="News/95-07-08-SFC-Video-PrematureDenial-1.htm#PhotoDucker">[San Francisco Chronicle]</a>.
Why has the picture of the individual who ducked the video
camera and was the subject of an extensive search by <span style="text-decoration: underline;">local</span> authorities never
been released to the public or the press ?</p>
<a id="Timms"></a>
<h1>8) Why has Ricky Timms never participated in any lineup, nor
been shown any alternative suspects ?</h1>
<p class="story">Ricky Timms <a href="News/93-07-12-NYT2a-RickyTims-1.htm#Handle">[NY Times]</a>, the Janitor during the Angelakos bombing at
Berkley in 1982, also produced a sketch reportedly similar to the final sketch.
Why has the Timms sketch never been released ?</p>
<a id="Reward"></a>
<h1>9) Why was the Nathan R note not released immediately ?</h1>
<p class="story">Why was it's release delayed, then combined with a reward of
$1,000,000.00. When the Nathan R note first appeared why did the FBI not just
release it immediately when the memory of the author should have been fresh. Why
wait for four months, then combine it with a reward of $1,000,000 <a href="News/93-10-07-LAT-NathanR-Reward%20Announced-1a.htm">[LA Times
DATED Oct 7]</a>. Was the real reason for the huge reward increasing the call volume
enough to hide the real author in the clutter if he happened to come forward ?
Additionally, was avoidance of recognition the purpose of disguising
the more memorable fact that it was written with a pen with no ink ?</p>
<a id="Count"></a>
<h1>10) Have public and private records been tampered with ?</h1>
<p class="story"> On August 7, 1990 <a href="News/90-08-07-USA-SUSPICIOUSCOUNT-1.htm#Count">[USA Today]</a>
electronic records show a <span style="text-decoration: underline;">dated</span> report in USA today which quoted the 3
dead and 27 injured. On Oct
6 1990 <a href="News/90-10-06-USA-3Dead-SUSPICOUSCOUNT-1.htm#Count">[USA Today]</a> a <span style="text-decoration: underline;">dated</span> report appears for USA today naming 3 dead, 23 injured and 16
bombings. On October 6, 1990 the actual figures were 1 dead, 20 odd injured and
12 bombings. The tally would not reach 3 dead, 23 injured and 16 bombings for another 4 years.
Given evidence on twa800.com of sophisticated records tampering no resolution to this is possible without an original hard
copy. Could this be an attempt to erase a mention of the wooden gear witnessed
by 9 people? Recent attempts to resolve this have only deepened the mystery.
The official microfilm version of USA today retrieved from the Pa State Library
is blank for the entire day of Oct 6,1990, leaving a long black segment of
Microfilm. My pursuit of verifiable pre-existing Handwriting <a href="NathanRNote.htm">[Nathan R Note]</a>
examples has proved particularly interesting in this respect. Records at North
Yarmouth Academy ("Winifred Burnham Purge") and Allegheny College were erased
for my years (1970-74) at sometime in the late 90's but maintained to date for
previous and later periods. In 1997, months
before my call, two
former Allegheny lovers and extended PenPals decided to suddenly burn love letters they had saved for twenty
five years. Legal records <a href="http://www.kingsolomonsgate.com/QT.htm">[Case Records]</a> retrieved from a twenty year old accident, and
independently searched by two parties (Mail Boxes etc Polson Mt and Kent Russell
Attorney) prior to my taking custody, contained every handwritten witness
statement except the one I wrote, and it was my case? Other similar incidents which
are not as independently confirmable have occurred. I report the above without comment cause I
can't make heads or tales of it either.</p>
<h1>11) Why does a re-reading of old News Articles feel like a prepping handbook for the case ?</h1>
<p class="story">During the years prior to the Manifesto dozens of citations in the Press refer to the bomber as a luddite,
brilliant, crazy, and a loner. The level of these comments in the years prior to
the Manifesto is striking. Given that only limited written communications were
received prior to 1995, how did they deduce all this from the bombs alone ? The
media record in retrospect, appears to be carefully molding public expectations
and perceptions.
The record of News articles in the VanPac case <a href="NewsVanPac.htm">[News History]</a> are
similarly troubling. The <a href="Download.htm">[Download site button]</a> includes a folder
(News) with a copy of every article published (labeled and ranked) and a number of
other useful files and Details. See for yourself.
Reading the news history of the case is highly enlightening.</p>
<a id="Community"></a>
<h1>12) WHY DO ALL ROADS SEEM TO LEAD TO THE "intelligence" COMMUNITY ?</h1>
<p class="story">Recent evidence links Kaczynski with
invoices from the CIA Mind Control program MKUltra <a href="MindControl.htm">[LA
Times]</a>
in the early 60's at Harvard. Given the hard evidence evidence linking Dettling to the
"Intelligence community" MB
Associates <a href="MBAssociates_Paige.htm#MBAssociates">[Mitchel Page Resume]</a>, <a href="Patent%203,771,152.htm">[Dettling Patent]</a> one is forced to ask if the
Kaczynski's Mk-Ultra Mind Control Program participation was a short or long term proposition. It seems like all roads in this murder
spree lead to the "Intelligence Community". See
also <a href="MKUltraInvoices.htm">[Atlantic Monthly]</a>.</p><br>
<ul class="menu">
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SketchMid.htm">HOME</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/News/97-11-11-USA-Graysmith-1.htm#BankDeposit">DEPOSIT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SketchMid.htm">MORPH</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/Witnesses.htm">WITNESSES</a></li>
<li><a href="http://unabombers.com/WoodenGearParty.htm">PARTY</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/SpellitSurvey.htm">MINDCONTROL</a></li>
</ul>
<br>
<p class=story align="center">
<a href="Sounds/SoundFiles/CogInWheelGQ.wav">Cool Sound bite</a><BR>
<a href="Hal2001.htm">FBI as HAL in 2001</a><BR>
<a href="http://www.Unabombers.com/TC/TC1.htm">Handwritten "The Call" Story</a><BR>
<a href="MN/MN1.htm">Handwritten "Manifesto Night" Story</a></p>
</body>
</html>