Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: new torch-based docling models #120

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

maxmnemonic
Copy link
Contributor

@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic commented Oct 2, 2024

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the
    conventional commits.
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Examples have been added, if necessary.
  • Tests have been added, if necessary.

@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic changed the title feat: Updating tests and layout_model_path for new torch-based layout model feat: Updating tests and layout_model_path for new torch-based layout model (WIP) Oct 2, 2024
@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic force-pushed the dev/new_layout_model branch from 7ad314b to 44dcf83 Compare October 3, 2024 14:37
@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic force-pushed the dev/new_layout_model branch from 1616b71 to 5d5e3ed Compare October 3, 2024 15:12
@maxmnemonic maxmnemonic marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 15:13
Copy link
Contributor

@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm changed the title feat: Updating tests and layout_model_path for new torch-based layout model (WIP) feat: new torch-based docling models Oct 3, 2024
@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm merged commit 2422f70 into main Oct 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm deleted the dev/new_layout_model branch October 3, 2024 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants