-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SerializationError('Asked to read 0x%x bytes; MAX_SIZE exceeded' % n)
#1028
Comments
Possibly related to https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-lib/issues/950 |
Could this have something to do with SegWit? According to this article, SegWit was activated on the very block my instance of Counterparty chokes on (i.e. 481,824). I know Counterparty doesn't yet support SegWit, |
FYI I just bumped my |
Closing this. The real problem is Counterblock. See here: CounterpartyXCP/counterblock#164 |
I am running
v9.55.4
ofcounterparty-lib
,v1.1.3
of `counterparty server and v0.13.2 of BTCDrak's addrindex patched Bitcoin Core.I was building the Counterparty database from scratch, and ran into the following error:
I added a
print(block_hash)
statement togetblock()
and rancounterparty-server start
several more times, and found that block0000000000000000001c8018d9cb3b742ef25114f27563e3fc4a1902167f9893
is always the offending block.I also found that the same error is thrown by
api_status_poller.run()
(whichserver.start_all()
calls before,blocks.follow()
, from which the above error is derived). The difference here is that the error is always returned for the most recently mined block.I then ran
counterparty-server bootstrap
and ran into the same problem, but this time the offending block was0000000000000000003214b15321a9198a3ff583ea140d5dcc6ff01e41b6c4cc
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: