-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Heavenly chips MAX/Reset bonus income wrong due to wrinklers? #248
Comments
Did you remember to change it to Earth Shatterer? |
Earth Shatterer doesn't affect the popping of wrinklers, does it? In any event, yes, in my testing I both put up a Diamond Skruuia and switched one of my auras to Earth Shatterer before starting the procedure. You can see the numbers drop before selling even a single building. Attached is an updated save with the appropriate god and aura slotted; all that's needed to test is to pop a single wrinkler and watch the expected numbers drop. |
No, it doesn't affect it, but right now I don't see it being an issue if popping one drops the number as long as in the end after you ascent, the calculated number is correct. You're saying this is not the case, so I'll take a look. |
Yup, definitely not the case; if I ascend with this save after doing All the Right Things I'm nowhere near 700 billion heavenly chips. At the moment it puts me at 564.26 billion. |
So looking at it a little bit, I think I do see a bug. I'll mark it as a bug once I've confirmed it. Thanks for reporting this! |
This seems to be related to #347 |
With my current save, Cookie Monster says that I'll get ~705 billion heavenly chips (with Skruuia in the Diamond slot, etc.) However, actually putting Skruuia in the Diamond slot and popping even one wrinkler causes the prestige numbers to plummet dramatically; actually popping them all, selling buildings, and so on results in only 560 billion or so chips. I'm not sure what's going wrong here.
Save file attached.
RaarBakery.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: