Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noting Paper 343 - CDS Guidelines and Conventions #343

Open
nealemorison opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Noting Paper 343 - CDS Guidelines and Conventions #343

nealemorison opened this issue Feb 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
Category: Noting Paper A paper outlining a specific outcome or clarification that is being posted for noting Industry: All This proposal impacts the CDR as a whole (all sectors)

Comments

@nealemorison
Copy link
Contributor

nealemorison commented Feb 26, 2024

In 2020 the Data Standards Body published Noting Paper 143 – CDR Conventions. NP143 proposed to introduce Conventions, which documented broadly accepted interpretations of the Consumer Data Standards, but did not impose compliance obligations.

This Noting Paper acknowledges that several forms of guidance, published by the Data Standards Body, have assumed the role intended for conventions.

As guidance has assumed the role intended for the Conventions proposed in NP143, the DSB proposes to phase out Conventions.

Where appropriate, the DSB will incorporate the content from existing conventions into the CDS Guide.

The Noting Paper is attached below:

Noting Paper 343 - CDS Guidelines and Conventions.pdf

@nealemorison nealemorison self-assigned this Feb 26, 2024
@nealemorison nealemorison added Category: Noting Paper A paper outlining a specific outcome or clarification that is being posted for noting Industry: All This proposal impacts the CDR as a whole (all sectors) labels Feb 26, 2024
@perlboy
Copy link
Contributor

perlboy commented Feb 26, 2024

Guidance outside of conventions has not assumed the role of conventions, in fact, there remain a glaringly large number of inaccuracies in published guidance, some of which have been raised and have remained unfixed and technically inaccurate for more than a year. In addition, guidance published by the DSB and other government bodies is regularly updated without change history, release status or versioning and often in reaction to participants raising ambiguity, often resulting in further ambiguity.

The DSB should factually verify all guidance before suggesting they are a suitable replacement for conventions which NP143 describes as being strongly recommended "wherever possible to maximise interoperability". Doing so in the current state of published guidance would have the opposite outcome.

@ProductCloudCDR
Copy link

This seems like a good simplification step @nealemorison. The ProductCloud team appreciate the guidance articles on the CDR support portal and rely on them. We have found them to be incredibly useful over the years.

Simplifying the concepts on the support portal seems like a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Category: Noting Paper A paper outlining a specific outcome or clarification that is being posted for noting Industry: All This proposal impacts the CDR as a whole (all sectors)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants